Anonymous ID: 60762f Nov. 30, 2020, 5:41 a.m. No.11840433   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0514

>>11840279

>They have been trying to sell its importance all day when I have never even heard of it, nor has, hell, every other anon who discussed it in the previous few breads. But they continuously are bringing up that site which tells me that it is a lure to get morons to go there and get tracked (or something). I could see bringing it up once and perhaps, if important, it being discussed. But their spam of it and the way they are spamming it reeks of bad news. Probably posting it to, as stated, lure unsuspecting people to the site to track them or put some malware on their system (given it is from a WS site) or just a diversionary means. That site has never once come up here so there is simply no reason a legitimate anon would be this into bringing it up again and again. Caution highly recommended.

It was/is run by the former bakers. Thus the importance. Just like the memes currently are.

Anonymous ID: 60762f Nov. 30, 2020, 5:53 a.m. No.11840539   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11840514

> a "former" baker is dubious as well

Former in this context is one of the /comms/ bakers, I dont recall which one, but if you continue to ask, you will get the name.