>>118493

No an anon was asking us to critique it and had made it up. He said so.

It was not a real document.

When many told him NO … he replied a little later

"Okay I won't" put it out there.

>>118572

BET He posted it and then took it down so it can't be referenced to him!

Is that possible?

>>118661

Was this in wikileaks emails?

We can use it from there.

Who is Todd Mackerr?

You know the name fags are grabbing it to tweet out right now.

>>118718

>twitter.com/wikileaks/status/793249680985509888

SAYS IT IS FAKE!

Why did Q post it first and then delete it?

He would have seen it was FAKE before.

Wikileaks says it is FAKE!

I have to say I am now VERY CONCERNED about the Q postings and information.

Why would Q post something Fake?

>>118831

Someone get his trip code and has been posting?

>>118846

>>118871

Have we been being played?

Is it all a sick joke?