Anonymous ID: 185da2 Jan. 21, 2018, 5:13 p.m. No.119067   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Maybe wikileaks had/decided to say it was fake at the time because it was just too obvious/damning?

If it was part of the plan to have the info get out there, but important to keep that plausible deniability that allows skeptics to remain skeptic, and interested/curious people to be informed…

Now Q draws our attention to it but coats it in doubt and confusion, as its quickly deleted?

Does that make sense? Very curious to see how this plays out/what happened…