maybe the content is fake, but something in the address list, or one of the keywords is not.
DING DING DING WE HAVE A WINNER
Q would not paste incorrect information.
It was posted for a reason.
It was deleted for a reason.
Wikileaks never released, but that doesn't mean its fake, it means:
1) Q has access to some e-mails which wikileaks does not have
2) the e-mail is fake, however, something in the content is not fake (collective soul? the dogs are loose? pre-programming of machines? are the machines PEOPLE?)
Post & delete would cause confusion for anons, however, post & delete would be a taunt for someone in the know, ie, if I knew the mail was legit, that would be to scare the shit out of me if I was the subject of the email?
or it was a flag?
sometimes Q says misdirection is necessary. If it is fake, then Q needed misdirection to occur for a reason (perhaps someone said something that might have tipped off the baddies, so this was some instant smokescreen)
if it was real, maybe Q deleted it to draw even more attention to it? or perhaps it needed to be deleted within "10" minutes to provide a marker? perhaps it just doesn't need to stay on the timeline for long term, but is necessary for us to focus on it now in short term.
https:// www.wabe .org/upcoming-atlanta-concerts-ed-roland-holiday-shows-and-more/
to early in march, but notice the necklace.