Anonymous ID: baf13b Jan. 21, 2018, 5:17 p.m. No.119117   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9147 >>9334

>>119014

What’s more interesting is that Wikileaks confirmed it’s a fake. Obviously if it attributed to them, they can confirm not having posted it, but how could they confirm it a fake?

 

I admit it reads like a fake, but still…more explanation of origin and intent would awesome.