Not without a trial
We'll find out, or we won't. Or, it wa a test? Fuk, muh speculation!
In a way, knowing that even Q may be subject human mistakes (if that's the case, fuck, i'm speculating again!), is refreshing/relieving
IF Q WAS TESTING WITH POST #51
TO SEE HOW QUICKLY/EASILY WE WOULD GET DISTRACTED FROM WORK
wHO pASSED?
wHO fAILLED?
>twitter.com/m1Vr4/status/831235592365211649
saw that already, not trying shit faggot. key word there was IF
Until it comes from Q, we don't KNOW the reason for post 51, all we got is guesses, such as IFs
either way, point is WE SHOULD NOT BE DISTRACTED, AS I'm ALLOWING YOU TO DISTRACT ME NOW
not putting it out there, it's for my own records. good advice though
>Post & delete would cause confusion for anons, however, post & delete would be a taunt for someone in the know, ie, if I knew the mail was legit, that would be to scare the shit out of me if I was the subject of the email?
Excellent point, not everything posted by Q is direccted @ ANONS, posts are also for (((THEM))) LURKING here as well
And the Fake Anger Award for the day gooooes tooooooooo…this one!
Mad that you missed the drop, or REEEEALLY don't want anyone else to know it was there? hmmmm
Amen Anon, Amen!