>>11854704 (pb)

I was trying to show you how unproven evidence is misconstrued, then it gets pumped into the public, or public opinion.

If you can't see that, then you don't understand how we need provable facts, not fantasy speculation of events.

MSM twists their 'facts', which we know to be not truthful to start with in most, (majority) cases.

So are we suppose to do the same and become the evil they have become, after all, 'WE ARE THE NEWS NOW', or is that a lie?

I think not.

WE are reseachers exposing TRUTH, not trying to fabricate a truth based upon a supossedly event, then push it out to the public.

There is a big difference, and you know that.

>>11854763

I know that, you apparently know that, but how many gulible ones in here jump at anything and everything, even bakers and notable collectors jump at them.

Yet, here we are letting slides into notables, letting 'opinion' into notables, but hey 'WE ARE THE NEWS NOW'.

How long before we reach the ranks of 'FAKE NEWS'?

>>11854796

OH MY!

Not the court of public opinion!