fake and ghey
KYS shill
>You go with this
Projection
>the fact of what was doesn't upset you
Fake.
>There is Q
Yes.
>There are Anons
Yes.
>There is a hashtag…
Twitter is cabal, it's irrelevant what Twitter publishes as a publisher.
There is no other reason for the shills to post a 'Q_Anon' banner unless they want to divide.
Try again.
The banner is being pushed WITHIN THE BREADS by shills trying to push the fake 'QAnon' fake news creation.
KYS
>ANYONE who benefitted from this Chinese support is suspect.
[D]_People's_Republic_of_China
BYE BYE D PARTY!
And 100 years of money printing is different today because….
Fail.
Disclaimer built in.
This one's a little better.
Projecting panic.
NO YOU FUCKING LYING SACK OF SHIT, THE SOLE PURPOSE OF SHILLS POSTING THE BANNER WITHIN THE BREADS, BREAD AFTER BREAD AFTER BREAD, IS TO PUSH THE NARRATIVE OF 'Q_ANON' TO BE SYNTACTICALLY READ IN THE MIND AS 'CUEAHNON'
>jew
And there it is, proof you're a fucking worthless shill.
WE ARE ANONS.
It's not the legislature per se, it is the "Senate oversight committee"
"bUt I cAn sEe pEoPlE oUtSiDe WiTh 'BlAcKs fOr tRuMp' sHirTs"
That dumbass Senator wants us to ignore the fact that BLM is a Democrat Party front org financed by D par donors?
Censor from what, Google searches?
Fail again.
Consensus Crack shill fail.
Think logically.
If Bill Barr KNOWS Trump won the election, then no amount of fraud could CHANGE THAT OUTCOME.
Bill Barr is toying with the media.
By phrasing it as "no fraud that would CHANGE THE OUTCOME", Barr NEVER SAID the outcome as of today is that Biden won and that fraud exposure will 'change' that outcome.
His statement can read as:
"Trump won the election, and there is no amount of fraud THAT WILL CHANGE TRUMP'S VISTORY".
Barr, by the way, is ALSO testing Anons and Normies.
Say it that way and TEST to see HOW the statement is understood.
Barr never said Biden won.
Do you notice that you're PRESUMING the fake news narrative that Biden won such that the only connection to Trump winning is that the election outcome would have to be 'changed'?
Ding ding ding. Barr is also testing the waters to see how the people are thinking.
You have to PRESUME Biden won in order to INTERPRET Barr's statement that BARR believes Biden won.
Think more carefully about what Barr is reported to have said.
Think carefully. Barr never said there was fraud. He is reported by AP to have said there is no fraud THAT WOULD CHANGE THE OUTCOME. That outcome is also LEFT UNADDRESSED. Barr was not reported as saying he believes Biden won.
This is not the same thing as saying there was no fraud.
Barr was not reported as saying he believes Biden won. You added that yourself. Why? Fake news got you.
Fake news got to you.
All you idiots projecting your own fake news narrative into Barr's head is what's relevwnt here.
Barr was not reported to have said he believes Biden won.
FOCUS ON 'CHANGE THE OUTCOME'
HOW DO YOU DEFINE THE OUTCOME?
FAKE NEWS THAT BIDEN WON?
OR…THE CONSTITUTION?