wording is quite interesting why do they keep saying "widespread fraud"?. Of course the fraud wasn't widespread enough where that might change the outcome, it was in select swing states and specifically big cities in those states where the fraud was substantial enough to change the outcome. Wording is very important.
I don't know if Barr is playing stupid, if AP is twisting his words or he's a sleeper. Either way, there's just too much evidence of fraud in the key areas.