I like this guy's delivery. Good reminder to speak slowly and methodically even when you're told you only have 3 minutes to state your case.
I take that back. I don't know what he's saying.
He's a con.
This guy is trying to say that all the people giving evidence about fraud and intimidation are just feeling hurt and upset and imagining it all. They're just "ignorance" and "untrained". This guy is the biggest loser I've heard yet. Actors EVERYWHERE.
Ya they really are stupid. They always give themselves away with some "tell" in their performance.
Worth pointing out that the old fagstachioed shill gave no evidence in his testimony whatsoever. He only gave opinion. He didn't give any testimony to suggest that the previous witnesses were wrong or acting irrationally, but that they were just "feeling hurt." So without any evidence, nothing he said should be considered testimony anyhow.
If I were a senator, I would have said, "Sir, do you have any evidence to present of any kind or just an opinion?"