>What say you, Mr. Barr? Mr. 'No widespread fraud'.
This is NOT what Barr said:
He said that there wasn't fraud that would change the outcome of this election.
Meaning that even if there was fraud (and there WAS fraud) it won't change the outcome.
What is the outcome?
Trump won and no fraud will change that.
Q already said that they knew their playbook.
>Im having major cognitive dissonance..
You need to trap these gangsters.
You need to let them commit fraud.
You need to show that courts are corrupt.
That the whole system is corrupt.
When people can see that, you'll be able to hand this all to the mil.
"The only way is the military."
But first people must be able to see the corruption.
Only then they will accept mil courts.
This DS is a global mafia, imo.
Nothin more, nothing less.
They blackmail and intimidate (& worse).
Only the mil is strong enough, dangerous enough and comitted enough
to bring justice in a in a system rotten to the core.
It always reminds me of the times when the famous mafia hunter Falcone tried to hunt down the mafia in Sicily.
Only when they blew up his car,
enough ordinary people were willing to protest against the corrupt institutions in all of Italy and demand justice.
>But who really knows
High IQ reply.
Because we all don't know.
Only few can admit that.
And only so few can accept that they just can't know, if Barr is friend or foe.
Time will tell.
Or:
"Watch what happens!"
Imo, the goal is not to get to the SC.
The goal is to show that military courts are the only way to restore justice.
Hi, Fren!