This is from April 2018.
This is such a dumb argument…
I still say all that Q was saying was that there are no "Qanons" and that this was directed at the paytriots calling all of us "Qanons".
It appears the issue is that people that have been here the whole time view one thing and perceive most of what goes on here objectively. It seems issues emerge once the "telephone game" is initiated and new people start making assumptions and then preaching them as truth.
The reality of the situation is that calling anyone on chan boards somethinganon is totally common. Yes, we called Q "Qanon" quite a bit in the beginning. We have patches, memes, websites, websites, blogs, youtube videos and all sorts of shit that random ass people have created that could be attributed to the movement with "Qanon" somewhere in the name.
One of the biggest and most useful websites we've had, which as been around virtually the entire time, is qanon.pub, a very helpful website.
This is a moronic argument and this months long slide seems to have been perpetrated by people that both don't want us to realize the true aim of the drop and who want to send the board in to further disarray (or at least take advantage of any disarray).
The arguments about what words we use, as if we were language police (which is comically absurd, given the nature of this platform), what images we display and who we call what are not done by anons. These are things we've long purged from our general discourse, as these types of distractions have long been cast off as useless, tedious and annoying.
Entertain the brainlets and normalfags at your own peril.