Whistleblowers Dispute Over 1 Million Ballots, Cite Dominion Tampering, Shipping Filled Ballots Across State Lines

The Amistad Project has gathered whistleblowers and sworn declarations revealing over one million potentially fraudulent swing-state ballots, including completed ballots getting shipped across state lines, postal service workers being told to prioritize Biden mail, and officials tampering with Dominion systems to prevent an audit.

In total, over 300,000 ballots are at issue in Arizona, 548,000 in Michigan, 204,000 in Georgia, and over 121,000 in Pennsylvania.

“The declarations state that unlawful actions by state and local election officials in swing states, and possibly U.S. Postal Service officials,” the Amistad Project noted.

The evidence details “the failure of election officials in blue jurisdictions to maintain ballot chain of custody,” and include “photographs of individuals improperly accessing voting machines and a detailed eyewitness account of the breaking of sealed boxes of ballot jump drives and commingling of those jump drives with others.”

In addition to voting machine tampering, the Amistad Project’s findings reveal efforts by Postal Service officials in at least three of six swing states. “Details include potentially hundreds of thousands of completed absentee ballots being transported across three state lines, and a trailer filled with ballots disappearing in Pennsylvania,” the group notes.

The Amistad Project feels that one whistleblower, a USPS truck driver Jess Morgan, had “fraudulent ballots were mistakenly placed” in his Pennsylvania-bound truck:

“On October 21, he arrived at Bethpage where he saw 24 gaylords (large cardboard containers used by USPS) and was told they contained mail-in ballots. He saw 24 gaylords containing bulk mail bins filled with identically-sized ballot envelopes stacked crosswise, which likely contained 144,000-288,000 ballots or more. He could see contained handwritten return addresses and one was even marked Certified Mail, prompting the expediter to remark that the person must have really wanted the ballot to get to its destination. Both of these observations revealed the ballots had already been completed and were being returned to be counted.

Mr. Morgan got to Harrisburg at 9:15 a.m., ballots in tow, but was forced to sit in the USPS yard until 3:00 p.m. When he went inside to speak with someone because his hours were about to expire, a self- identified “transportation supervisor” made himself known and instructed Jesse to drive the whole load to Lancaster without unloading the portion intended for Harrisburg. The “transportation supervisor” would not provide him with a written slip, saying he would need to unload in Harrisburg in order to receive a slip.

Morgan drove to Lancaster under orders from the Harrisburg postal supervisor, unhooked the trailer in the normal place, parked his tractor in the normal place, and went home. The next day, his trailer, the only trailer he ever used on his Bethpage route, was gone.”

https://thenationalpulse.com/news/amistad-project-disputes-ballots/

Former Trump Campaign Manager Makes Startling Admission In Fox Interview

Former Trump Campaign manager Brad Parscale sits down with Fox News’ Martha MacCallum for his first interview since leaving the campaign. “I think the President is still clearly in a position that he might be able to pull this off.”

https://breaking911.com/watch-former-trump-campaign-manager-makes-startling-admission-in-fox-interview/

Watch: Obama Casually Admits His Drone Strikes Killed "Inordinate Amount" Of Innocent Civilians

Barack Obama is on his book tour for A Promised Land now four years after leaving office. During his latest interview days ago on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert he was asked about his vastly expanded drone strikes (setting a record far and above that of the prior Bush administration) as a preferred method of taking out America's 'enemies'. But it's very well-documented that drone strikes actually killed just as many or more civilians than terrorists in the process.

The former Democratic president still can't shake his legacy as the "drone president" given he still holds the record for number of ordered kill missions. Now it appears he's simply embracing the label. This latest interview may have sealed this legacy - indeed it could be his own Madeleine Albright "we think the price is worth it" moment.

In the interview Obama admits that saying "collateral damage" is basically the nicer sanitized way of saying "it killed people who were innocent and not just targets".

So he basically casually acknowledged on national TV that he killed a lot of innocent people. And then this incredibly awkward line:

"The problem with the drone program was not that it caused an inordinate amount of civilian casualties, although even 1 civilian casualty is tragic. But the drones probably had less collateral damage."

As journalist Eoin Higgins noted there was "Zero pushback from Colbert here as Obama defends his drone war in pretty revolting terms."

And Glenn Greenwald, who spent years covering Obama's drone killings when he was at The Guardian had this to say…

Here's the section his book, where the former president actually attempts to present himself as the well-intentioned 'savior' of those victims he ordered killed:

In places like Yemen and Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq, the lives of millions of young men like those three dead Somalis (some of them boys, really, since the oldest pirate was believed to be nineteen) had been warped and stunted by desperation, ignorance, dreams of religious glory, the violence of their surroundings, or the schemes of older men. I wanted somehow to save them—send them to school, give them a trade, drain them of the hate that had been filling their heads. And yet the world they were a part of, and the machinery I commanded, more often had me killing them instead.

Further into the interview he said that killing by "machinery" was becoming "too easy". He says he had to impose what he called internal controls to remind the military and drone operators "this is isn't target practice".

Meanwhile, NatSec insider architects of Obama's drone policies and secretive 'kill list' are baaaaaack…In the end Obama's book and interview remarks on drone strikes are full of cringeworthy levels of self-justification and rationalization for killing what many human rights studies have estimated to be multiple hundreds.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/watch-obama-still-defends-drone-strikes-after-admitting-inordinate-amount-civilians

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/watch-obama-still-defends-drone-strikes-after-admitting-inordinate-amount-civilians

https://twitter.com/RaheemKassam/status/1333946043541676037

Raheem Kassam

@RaheemKassam

CNN Leaked Ed Call: Tucker Carlson is ‘White Supremacy Hour’ https://thenationalpulse.com/breaking/cnn-tucker-carlson/

via @RaheemKassam

Attorney General Bill Barr Wins Helen Keller Award

Congrats to Bill Barr. He is the runaway winner for revealing himself as totally Deaf, Dumb and Blind. Hell, even Helen Keller could see the widespread fraud that infects this entire Presidential election, but not Billy Barr. After two years of talking a good game, Barr’s masquerade as someone opposed to the criminality of the Deep State is exposed as a venal lie. He himself is a fraud. He is no better than Jim Comey or Eric Holder. In fact, he is worse. Barr pretended to uphold the principles of justice for all and a commitment to the founding tenets of this Republic.

Barr’s comment to the AP–i.e., that the DOJ has not uncovered any evidence of widespread fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 election–is being widely and wildly celebrated by the thieves responsible for stealing the 2020 Presidential election. They got away with it (so far).

But you know why the DOJ has not uncovered “any evidence of widespread fraud?” Because the DOJ, including the FBI, has refused to look for it or at it. Compare the frenzied response of the FBI charging off to investigate an alleged racist rope used to close a garage door for a black NASCAR driver. They spent a weekend trying to determine if the knot was a noose. It wasn’t.

Look at the lame predication used to open Crossfire Hurricane–an Australian diplomat closely tied to the Clinton Foundation falsely claims that somone loosely tied to the Trump campaign had info about Russian dirty tricks. Turns out that was a lie. The FBI and DOJ went all in, including filing false statements before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court in a desperate attempt to destroy Donald Trump.

Yet, in the face of a tidal wave of affidavits from hundreds of witnesses and clear evidence that millions of votes magically appeared for Joe Biden, Bill Barr has the audacity to asset there is no “widespread evidence of fraud.” Barr, you’re a goddamn liar.

I commend Joe Hoft’s rant for your reading. He provides a nice summary of several of the key pieces of evidence that normally would incite the interest of even the most incompetent, disinterested U.S. Attorney General. Sadly, Bill Barr has betrayed the Republic.

I apologize to the readers who previously endured my assurances that I had it on good authority that Barr could be trusted. You skeptics were right

Here is what an honest Attorney General would have done. When asked about the “fraud” he would note that there are many reports of illegal activity and that they need to be fully investigated. He would also interject that it is too early to concluded whether or not the fraud was consequential with respect to the outcome of the election. He would ask how is it possible that a doddering old man who could barely attract a small group of supporters wound up with more votes than Barack Obama. He would ask how is it possible that Barack Obama won 200 more counties across America than Joe Biden, yet Biden supposedly had more votes? Only a lazy fool would accept such nonsense.

Then he would get off his corpulent ass and insist the FBI do its damn job. But the FBI is now revealed as more crooked and bereft of honor than the Russian mob.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/attorney-general-bill-barr-wins-helen-keller-award/

>>11865002

https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/us-swiss-dual-national-extradited-united-states-connection-investment-and-bank-fraud

>>11865158

>https://kraken-wood.com/2020/12/01/kraken-release-to-dominion-systems-statement-on-massive-election-fraud-charged-by-sidney-powell/

Look at this shit!

Dominion Voting Systems has issued a statement responding to lawsuits we filed in Michigan and Georgia. Dominion is lying. This is a massive fraud that has infected the voting system across this country. Evidence continues to pour in on behalf of all the Plaintiffs. Legal votes cast nationwide created a historic landslide for Donald Trump.

Dominion contends that it is impossible for any tampering of the votes on its machines to have occurred. Our evidence proves otherwise. Prior analysis of server logs on Dominion’s machines in Georgia primary elections has shown remote access into those servers in the middle of the night when no election workers were around, possibly by Dominion employees overseas or on behalf of adverse nation-states such as Iran and China. Witnesses have observed what appeared to be Dominion technical support staff connecting remotely to election servers during tabulation of the primary and runoff elections in Georgia to resolve “technical problems” with uploading memory cards. That action violated Georgia and federal law that required certification of the machines and no manipulations.

Dominion also contends that any such tampering would have been revealed by the hand count audit conducted in Georgia. This is not true. The ballots marked by the Ballot Marking Devices (BMD) do not record the vote in a software-independent way. Instead, Dominion’s software is responsible for taking the voter’s machine input and printing it on the paper ballot in a QR code that contains the vote that is read by the scanner, but cannot be read by humans, and a text summary that can be read by humans.

Robust and repeatedly confirmed behavioral research shows that only around 6.5% of voters actually bother to scrutinize the human readable text summary. Thus, more than 93% of these allegedly “voter verifiable ballots” are not in fact “voter-verified” at all. See Exhibit 7 to

the Georgia complaint, Appel, DeMillo & Stark, Ballot Marking Devices (“BMDs) Cannot Assure the Will of the Voters (February 14 2020), p. 11. The authors of this study are highly distinguished professors of computer

1

science, including Richard A. DeMillo of Georgia Tech. Simply put, the BMD ballots are not “voter-verified” because 93.5% of the time voters do not actually “verify” them.

Further, it has been repeatedly established that Dominion’s BMDs are vulnerable to hacking. Substantial evidence of this vulnerability was discussed in Judge Amy Totenberg’s October 11, 2020 Order in the USDC N.D. Ga. case of Curling, et al. v. Kemp, et. al, Case No. 1:17-cv-02989 Doc. No. 964. See, p. 22-23 (“This array of experts and subject matter specialists provided a huge volume of significant evidence regarding the security risks and deficits in the system as implemented in both witness declarations and live testimony at the preliminary injunction hearing.”); p. 25 (“In particular, Dr. Halderman’s testing indicated the practical feasibility of a cyber-attack that could cause votes to be swapped or deleted and the compromise of the system through different cyber-attack strategies, including through access to and alteration or manipulation of the QR barcode.”) The full order refutes many of Dominion’s erroneous claims and talking points. As Judge Totenberg held,