>>11867034

Is this the first time he actually called out Gates?

>>11867040

Pepe Seeds?

Snot?

Vagisil Suppositories?

>>11867077

Seems reminiscent of "nasimfag" from way back.

Tactic recycled.

What do Anons want for Christmas?

(I just want to see the news literally break. Feed can go to static after reporters getting perpwalked off live camera - That's it.. No other gift needed)

>>11867156

Just irritating a.f.

>>11867213

If I remember correctly, there are tunnels, called DuPont Tunnels.

That may be relevant.

>>11867251

Already did, decades ago.

TxAnon

>>11867263

Nah.

If you invalidate the states proven fraudulent, then Biden has no claim to win.

Even if Trump does not have the magic 270, how would they kick him out of office?

Effectively he "would not have been elected" for the second term.

(win by default)

Does this pave the way for a 12yr presidency?

Does the impeachment (and lack of transfer of power) invalidate his first "term"?

He could be POTUS for more than a decade longer in best case…

>>11867319

I am tipping some Kraken Rum so…