>>>11867803
>
>>>11867792 (You)
>
>You literally just showed that you are Tom with that you, dumb fuck faggot.
How so?
https://8kun.top/midnightriders/res/16966.html#q17057
This is big if True!
>https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18702085/6/1/feehan-v-wisconsin-elections-comission/
THE COURT has before it Plaintiffs’ Emergency Motion for Injunctive Relief filed December 1, 2020, seeking:
1.An order directing the Defendants Wisconsin Elections Commission and Governor Tony Evers not to certify or to de-certify the 2020 election results in the Presidential and District 3 Congressional races;
2.An order enjoining Defendants from transmitting the currently certified Presidential election results to the Electoral College;
3.An order requiring Governor Evers to transmit certified Presidential election results that state that President Donald Trump is the winner of the election;
4.An immediate emergency order to seize and impound all servers, software, voting machines, tabulators, printers, portable media, logs, ballot applications, ballot return envelopes, ballot images,
The Court has reviewed the terms and conditions of this Emergent Injunctive Relief Order, and for good cause shown IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1.A Temporary Restraining Order is immediately in effect to preserve the voting machines in the State of Wisconsin, and to prevent any wiping or alteration of data or other records or materials, until such time as a full computer audit is completed;
2.Governor Evers and the Wisconsin Elections Commission are to de-certify the election results;
3.Governor Evers is hereby enjoined from transmitting the currently certified election results to the Electoral College;
4.Governor Evers is required to transmit certified election results that state that President Donald Trump is the winner of the election;
5.It is hereby Ordered that no votes received or tabulated by machines that were not certified as required by federal and state law becounted;
6.It is hereby declared and ordered that Wisconsin’s failed system of signature verification violates the Electors and Elections Clause by working a de facto abolition of the signature verification requirement;
7.It is hereby declared and ordered thatthe currently certified election results violate the Due Process Clause, U.S. CONST. Amend. XIV;
8.It is hereby declared and ordered that mail-in and absentee ballot fraud must be remedied with a Full Manual Recount or statistically valid sampling that properly verifies a ballot application for each absentee ballot, that verifies the signatures on absentee ballot envelopes, and that invalidates the certified results in the Presidential and District 3 Congressional races if the recount or sampling analysis shows a sufficient number of ineligible absentee ballots were counted;
9.It is hereby declared that absentee ballot fraud occurred in violation of Constitutional rights, Election laws and under Wisconsin state law;and
10.It is hereby declared and ordered that Governor Evers and the Wisconsin Elections Commission are enjoined from transmitting the currently certified results to the Electoral College based on the overwhelming evidence of election tampering;
>>>11867950 (You)
>
>Sigh… moran's can't read a heading.
I read it… still think it's worth looking into whose name is at the bottom of the last page: Hon. Pamela PepperDistrict Court JudgeEastern District of Wisconsin, Milwaukee Division
Also thinking that you having a problem investigating this speaks moar of you than those of us doing the research!
>Hon. Pamela PepperDistrict Court JudgeEastern District of Wisconsin, Milwaukee Division
>Put there by the people that PROPOSED the response. If the people "doing the research" can't
>
>read a document and figure that out… what does that say about them instead of me? C'mon, anon…
>>11867972 Yes I know it's proposed.. You act as though even this proposal is fake. However did you bother to follow the case trail? Look to the bottom, something will be coming out. Here's an image and the sauce:
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18702085/feehan-v-wisconsin-elections-commission/
>>>11868019 (You)
>
>I do not. I simply don't care about someone filing a suit that says "here's the ruling I think you should
>
>hand down." It's meaningless fluff, and you're just too fucking stupid to get that through your
>
>Neanderthal skull. Fuck it must be fun living life so fucking ignorant.
We'll see what happens won't we! Seeing you and your tag team friend..speaks volumes..
Why is this important.. Look who brought the complaint:
From the Original Complaint Information about the Plaintiffs
Plaintiff William Feehan,is a registered Wisconsin voter and a nominee of the Republican Party to be a Presidential Elector on behalf of the State of Wisconsin.Mr. Feehan is a resident of the City of La Crosse and La Crosse County, Wisconsin.
Presidential Electors “have a cognizable interest in ensuring that the final vote tally reflects the legally valid votes cast,”as “[a]n inaccurate vote tally is a concrete and particularized injury to candidates such as the Electors.”Carson v. Simon, 978 F.3d 1051, 1057 (8thCir. 2020) (affirming that Presidential Electors have Article III and prudential standing to challenge actions of state officials implementing or modifying State election laws); see also McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1, 27 (1892); Bush v. Palm Beach Cty.Canvassing Bd., 531 U.S. 70, 76 (2000) (per curiam).
25.Plaintiff Feehan has standing to bring this action as a voter and as a candidate for the office of Elector under Wis. Stat. §§ 5.10, et seq(election procedures for Wisconsin electors). As such, Presidential Electors “have a cognizable interest in ensuring that the final vote tally reflects the legally valid votes cast,”as “[a]n inaccurate vote tally is a concrete and particularized injury to candidates such as the Electors.”Carson v. Simon, 978 F.3d1051, 1057 (8thCir. 2020) (affirming that Presidential Electors have Article III and prudential standing to challenge actions of state officials in implementing or modifying State election laws); see also McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1, 27 (1892); Bush v. Palm Beach Cty. Canvassing Bd., 531 U.S. 70, 76 (2000) (per curiam).
https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/12/Feehan-ED-WI-Lawsuit-Complaint1.pdf
2nd Plaintiff
26.Plaintiff Derrick Van Orden is a former United States Navy SEAL, who was the 2020 Republican nominee for Wisconsin’s Third Congressional District Seat for the United States House of Representatives. Mr. Van Orden is a resident of Hager City, Pierce County, Wisconsin. 27.Mr. Van Orden “lost” by approximately 10,000 votes to the Democrat incumbent, U.S. Representative Ron Kind. Because of the illegal voting irregularities as will be shown below, Mr. Van Orden seeks to have a new election ordered by this court in the Third District, with that election being conducted under strict adherence with the Wisconsin Election Code.28.Plaintiff Van Orden has standing as the ostensible “defeated”candidate in the Third Congressional Districtrace, and seeks an order for a new election, complying with Wisconsin election law. Plaintiff Van Order received 189,524 votes or 48.67% as tallied versus Ron Kind who received 199,870 or 51.33% of the votes as reportedly tallied.
https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/12/Feehan-ED-WI-Lawsuit-Complaint1.pdf
Nice Gig you have going here Baker: db094d
Noticing.. how in your first post on the Wisconsin Case..
>>11867872 Baker introduces..the case here
>>11868286 Makes his own and his team work notable
>>11868042 d7cc9e
All the while team is telling anons this is not a worth while dig, interesting
>>11867843 , >>11867897 , >>11867872 , >>11867990 Feehan v. Wisconsin Elections Commission - Text of PROPOSED Order Governor Evers is required to transmit certified election results that state that President Donald Trump is the winner of the election.
What kind of game are you playing here baker???
You don't get to say that..Do you really think your dealing with stupid? You bring the subject to the forefront and then you have your little minions discredit everyone who give input into the matter. Top it all off you don't think there is any suspicion about the demoralizing statements made.. You people tell on yourselves each and every time.
>>11868438 (You)
do you have a point anon?
you assertations are patently false
I am just me
I found it exceedingly interesting
and anons discussed the merits back and forth
the first anons literally thought it meant trump had been declared the winner
that was obviously NOT true
It has been decided it may have zero merit at all unless adopted by the state legislature as the Constitution states that the State Legislature has the authority to control the delegation of Electoral College Votes
that is just the logically reasoned position as discerned by multiple anons (albiet a bit combatively) coming to the Truth
it IS STILL IN THE NOTABLES
so
what the fuck is your point?
Maybe you should read your posts again..made my point.. Now you use Discernment.
>>>11868438 (You)
>
>do you have a point anon?
>
>you assertations are patently false
>
>I am just me
>
>I found it exceedingly interesting
>
>and anons discussed the merits back and forth
>
>the first anons literally thought it meant trump had been declared the winner
>
>that was obviously NOT true
>
>It has been decided it may have zero merit at all unless adopted by the state legislature as the Constitution states that the State Legislature has the authority to control the delegation of Electoral College Votes
>
>that is just the logically reasoned position as discerned by multiple anons (albiet a bit combatively) coming to the Truth
>
>it IS STILL IN THE NOTABLES
>
>so
>
>what the fuck is your point?
Maybe you should read your posts again along with your teams..I made my point.. Now you use Discernment.