>>11867759 (LB)
Why would they?
That doesn't mean any information connecting narcs to larger cases should be on the interwebs.
That's the suit filed, not the ruling on the suit filed. They're requesting this action. It hasn't been granted.
And unsigned… c'mon anons.
No it's not. It's hope porn. It doesn't move anything.
Neither am I, but I'd be willing to bet this is part of the show where they stir the general public into
a frenzy demanding the election anomalies be fixed. Only then will they accept the truth about
what happened, and who won. It's referred to as "moving the Overton Window."
It's not even filed yet. There's no need to speculate on the wording until we know what is filed.
Sigh… moran's can't read a heading.
and I can't use an apostrophe correctly. The world is coming to an end.
Put there by the people that PROPOSED the response. If the people "doing the research" can't
read a document and figure that out… what does that say about them instead of me? C'mon, anon…
>they are gonna go after Trump in every which way that they can
Guaranteed Trump knows that and guaranteed the fact that he keeps getting "lucky," to the point
of setting the all-time and all-universe streak of luck that none of you idiots have figured out yet
means he's already games this out to make sure you idiots pay… bigly.
Indubitably.
I do not. I simply don't care about someone filing a suit that says "here's the ruling I think you should
hand down." It's meaningless fluff, and you're just too fucking stupid to get that through your
Neanderthal skull. Fuck it must be fun living life so fucking ignorant.
"THIS IS HOW I WANT YOU TO RULE, PLEASE HONOR MY DEMAND!"
I really don't get why anybody would find this interesting. Should the author have added "and
I'd like a weekend with Sasha Grey just to make it legiter!" to, well… make it legiter?
Retards anonymous is looking for new members. You should apply.
It can't be signed. Judges lack that authority. Fuck, have none of you retards leaned anything?
>Wht are the chances a democrat judge will sign that?
Zero, nor would a Republican judge. No judge, for that matter, would sign such an order because
they lack that authority. The Constitution is pretty clear: state legislatures control the EC votes
for their respective states.
OMG, Sundance is an idiot. If there was anybody in the world that didn't understand the law, Sundance
was the one that taught him.
You're new here, aren't you, moran?
No. They were talking strategy. We won't find out for a while what that strategy is, unfortunately.