Anonymous ID: 837d70 Dec. 2, 2020, 1:22 a.m. No.11868766   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8777

>>11868754

I mean that is the globalists dream, right. Whatever they can dream up to use your DNA for, like tracking, modification, or tailored viruses, won't be a good thing.

 

Its just the next logical step after thumb print, facial recognition, iris scanners, gait recognition. Fuck them.

Anonymous ID: 837d70 Dec. 2, 2020, 1:43 a.m. No.11868871   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8883

>>11868831

Has its ups and downs. Downs being half way around the world during the holidays, in the case of travel lockdowns.

 

Fuckers. I hate them all! We are at the precipiceโ€ฆ.Q+Trump can restore order or I guess it'll be plan Z. I'm still not off grid though, working on it.

Anonymous ID: 837d70 Dec. 2, 2020, 2:12 a.m. No.11869009   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9064 >>9172 >>9308

>>11868943

For all we know, it might still be a new government when Trump wins. I don't see this going back to the way it was before.

 

I wrote on here a few days ago that the Inalienable Rights really need to be codified into the Constitution itself, rather than assumed or addressed one by one in the Articles. Essentially like a preamble, saying "Look these rights are given by God and guaranteed, period. In ADDITION to those, we have these Articles."

Anonymous ID: 837d70 Dec. 2, 2020, 2:28 a.m. No.11869074   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9083

>>11869064

For sure. But I"m worried about the big ones, like "You can't have my DNA", "You can't force me to purchase or consume something I don't want", "you cannot deprive me of earning a living," "you cannot invade my body with tech,".

 

Basically codifying "Life, liberty and pursuit of happiness" into more concrete terms.