>Obama, Bush and Clinton
>to build public trust
Is there any reason they should be considered 'trust worthy' apart from how the msm intends to portrays them?
isn't it likely that there is a provision that allows for martial law to be in effect without immediate public knowledge?
biden pretending to take the vaccine live wouldn't be considered as 'building trust'?
(((hollywood))) is a satanic place
anons aren't really expected at the garage
the more anons know, the more time will be spent at the battlefield, and rightfully so.
wouldn't most of the voter fraud committed at the election sites be caught if every working station was monitored by a camera?
there is no 'born this way' to lgbtq
my understanding of autism is that autists are trying to make their own sense of reality (autodidacticism or self-education), because others around them aren't making sense.
it's a perilous path due to the degenerate jew being around