>>11884931 lb

Remember, in a game of chess, the pieces on the board are visible. Our moves are just as visible to them as theirs are to us. Do not mistake the ivory tower 'elites' as the ones we are playing against.

I don't think anyone, myself included, can truly grasp the collapse of a continent into civil war in this era. While there are some historical analogs, nothing quite matches the scale except for the three kingdoms era of China.

The problem is that we are fundamentally constructive and they are destrictive, but hold the financial advantage. When the food shuts down to the cities from business - they step in with government and rations. Support them or go hungry. Do as they say or go hungry. That could include becoming manpower for war efforts against us. Foreign militaries as advisors and training.

Much the same occurred during the first civil war. Union soldiers were generally inferior to Confederacy soldiers in terms of marksmanship, morale, and discipline. The Confederacy trunced the Union army in most early engagements.

It was because the Union could throw more people and industry at the problem (the North had no problem using desperate immigrants as slaves by other names) that the Confederacy ultimately lost.

That, and the Union went scorched earth, burning farmland and towns to the ground as they went.

The globalists will be able to play gatekeeper with supplies sourced from outside the conflict zone and they need only deploy teams of arsonists and surgical strikes to mitigate our capacity to resist their demands. If the states fail to reclaim sovereignty or the military fails to uphold the Constitution - then the war will go very bloody very fast.

Keep in mind, they do not particularly need us as far as they think. They do not need or want the U.S. as an effective independent power - anything that damages us is consistent with that goal.

>>11885074

Keep in mind that their goal is the destruction of our capability to command on the global stage. If they could win in a stand up war or nuclear exchange, they would in a heartbeat. The problem is that even as 'comped' as our system is, it is still 'ours.' Biden and the like are simple whores selling us out for money and influence. The people enabling them to do so (and handing them the money) are the real players with designs and goals. The whores think their pussy is irresistible and that they are being given power and influence due to some kind of merit. They do not completely understand any part of the plan for the one world goverment other than cock and money.

Smart people tend to be good, or at least competitive with evil. Evil therefore relies upon stupid to fulfil its ambitions as useful tools.

Even if we 'win' in the event of a civil war - when we return to the global stage, we will be a mere shadow of what we were.

The Navy is key to force projection and securing our allies - Korea, Japan, and Australia. With us out of the strategic picture, China will stage a land war against Korea that it cannot maintain. Or, more likely, will utilize extremely aggressive trade and embargo policies. Remember, without us as a consumer, many of these nations hurt - and while China is financially imploding, they can send off their disenfranchised on wars of conquest with little concern.

Taiwan, Japan, and Australia will generally be usurped. If not directly by force, then less directly by economic means. God only knows what will be done to elicit compliance of their population. Oh. And New Zealand, but they will be spreading their legs in celebration of a Chinese conquest of their land, so whatever.

When the U.S. does return after settling our internal affairs - we will be starting from square one. Will we still have functional carriers? Air wings? The manufacturing infrastructure to maintain them?

Computer technology - will we be making our own integrated circuits again and how much of our own rebuilding will need to be purchased from the global order which arose in our absence?

Putin may not be our enemy, but he is also not necessarily our friend. While Russia does not want the U.S. removed from the strategic picture - they do look forward to the opportunities afforded by destabilization and to purchase favor with the new order coming to power within the U.S. We are a good check against China and Europe and that is what they want us for, primarily. … That and to stop funding muslim militants in their back yard. For some strange reason those same militants aren't fighting savagely against China - but that's another tangent.

My point is that if things do come down to a civil war, we truly win in the long run not by killing and destroying, but by rebuilding and restoring at a breakneck pace. We absolutely must come out of it with greater industrial capacity independent of foreign meddling. That will be difficult to achive and we will have to carefully avoid unnecessary destruction of our infrastructure and assets while seizing control of our system.

>>11885227

Conference calls and DMing each other on Twitter.

It's also like saying we must all be collaborating to call the election fraud or to dig on leads of corruption. It's … Just what we do. Sure, there is some organization and coordination - but a lot of it comes from the type of people we are and how we think.

Consider the world of the urban elites. Nepotism drives them. You appeal to your boss to get favored for promotions and the like. However, the most cost efficient way to look good is not to be outstanding or to take risks - but to shame others. This is why the left can't joke or meme - if they make themselves look silly, then that is ammunition for someone else to look good. They are caught in a world where everything is taken super-literally and where that silly thing you did last week becomes a headline two years from now because you pissed off a twitter brigade by suggesting you could achieve a project goal they said was impossible. How dare you look better than them.

In this way, the culture can shape the behavior of people - if not by changing them, then by selecting for those predisposed to or agreeable with those behaviors. They will act and believe the way the culture requires of them.without centralized dispatch and control.