>>11885874

That was always how it was back in the day. You voted for who you thought the best person was, or the LOTE. Look how quickly things moved with Johnson, Nixon, Carter, Reagan.

Say Wood doesn't like Kemp or Abrams. Maybe Kemp is untouchable in the R primary, but Abrams opponent has a shot. You vote in D primary for Abram's opponent.

Also, good bet, IMO, either Loeffler or Perdue got beat by Collins and/or dems never made the runoff. Loeffler/Perdue can't trash that election because it will show they're complicit in the scam.

Wood goes medieval on Kemp's ass, as does POTUS. Where's Loeffler and Perdue? Wood will take them out unless Trump saves their ass with a rally. Thing is, the deal is Perdue and Loeffler have to go medieval on Kemp's ass, or no deal. My take. Good cop bad cop and the fear of God as leverage.

You have to get the original election voided, because if you vote again under the same procedures it validates the first election. If people came out and voted, it couldn't have been a big deal with the scam thing. No judge will rule on any original election shenanigans if the runoff goes on under the same rules.

First election has to be exposed and voided.

Also, what the fuck is the use of a 52-48 Senate with Romney, Collins and Murkowski. They'll run to the cameras on any critical vote just to puff up their profile.

Senate need to be 54-46. Ist election voided and re-done.

>>11886031

Not in the US at this time. Live in a country that has multiple parties.

You end up with a 5% party getting into government because they cut a deal. Think AOC forming a party, getting 5% of the vote and cutting a deal to put a 46% party in power. You get AOC as defense minister or some fucking thing.

>>11886075

These fuckwads get rich on their opinions on issues like climate change that no one living will ever live to see proven out.

On black/white immediate consequence issues that POTUS delivers on all you see is how incompetent they are.

JFC. Screeching about a slim Senate majority with Romney, Collins and Murkowski given free reign to hold the country hostage.

>>11886160

Watching the MI hearing yesterday. At the end the D soyboy threw out Barr saying there was no fraud in Rudy's face.

Rudy swatted his shit, but no reason for that sound bite opportunity to be offered up at this juncture.

I don't think Barr is too dumb to know better. Comped fits.

>>11886205

You figure to estimate need and to program an algo to squeeze out an election win without going into overvote, you would need historical precinct voting trends.

That data might not be on the servers, but the links to that data are. I think they would be hard access links, like VPN, SSH, not just web links. That would be recoverable.

If the algos also used code/data from previous steals, that would be recognizable as well.

>>11886291

Why would Barr just tell POTUS now about something he did in October?

Maybe the SC is investigating Trump & Family.

>>11886364

Yes. All the analysts showing charts is one thing.

The original hardware with data & logs is quite the other.

They said they wanted to see the evidence. I don't think we'll disappoint.