Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 3, 2020, 1:22 p.m. No.11892093   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>11892008

I think you nailed it, anon. Third image has the massive rock her cuck husband bought her.

 

https://www.google.com/search?q=Elena+Parent&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjOjaiZ37LtAhXCt1kKHaN-AT8Q_AUoAXoECBEQAw&biw=1536&bih=722#imgrc=0zNGUGn7GjDnqM

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 3, 2020, 1:25 p.m. No.11892148   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2181 >>2206

Ed's laying it on think, now

https://twitter.com/Snowden/status/1334608745192677380

Edward Snowden

@Snowden

Mr. President, if you grant only one act of clemency during your time in office, please: free Julian Assange. You alone can save his life. @realDonaldTrump

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 3, 2020, 1:31 p.m. No.11892253   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>11892206

It won't be revealed until the very end what side of all this Assange is on, but I've ranged from suspecting him to be a black hat, to being on the fence about him ever since all this shit started.

 

>>11892181

>freeing Assange in December in 2018?

That's not at all what Q said. Q said the world would learn the truth in July.

Let's see, here:

https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2018/07/blind-items-revealed-38.html

 

I really wanted to call this one full circle, but think I have used that name before.This involves three women and a few men, but it is the way this all came to be which is the most interesting thing. The first woman we will call A. You all know her and she ended up with the job. She was not the first or even the second choice, but in the long run, she has worked out well and looking back, probably the best choice.

 

A (former A- list mostly television actress) was chosen by a guy named M. M is one of those guys who has a ton of money and throws enough in the air until women close their eyes and shut out all thought until the sexual act is over. A always seems to need money and has openly admitted in the past to exchanging sex for money. Meanwhile M has kind of collection of one type of woman he wants to sleep with and keeps a running total of them. He has told friends he is up to almost 100. It is a special kind of celebrity.

 

Anyway, the first choice was kind of unusual. The first choice was B. The reason they wanted B is because she spends a great deal of time in the country where she was needed and famous enough, but not too famous where it would work. Finally, she too is known to accept money for arrangements, but here was the sticking point. Usually, even though she is a permanent A list singer in that country, she is the one bearding for lesser known people and never actually has sex with them. They pay to be seen with her and she will live with them, but there is no sex. According to the demands of the ultimate employer, he wanted to be able to have sex with the woman chosen.

 

The second choice was an interesting choice. We will call her C. She is an interesting choice. She lives in the country where she was needed. C also fit the bill of famous, but not too famous. She was perfectly willing to have sex when needed and had done that frequently to land many of her reality jobs/singing gigs. What ultimately disqualified her was N. Apparently N had been instructed by his employers that C was being claimed, yes that was the word used, by someone who she had yachted with in the past and he wanted her available to him when needed. N and M are best buddies.

 

So, in the end, A was chosen and has been doing it for several years at this point. She has made over $1M for her work. Will she end up going to jail? I think it is more likely she will end up killed rather than jailed.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 3, 2020, 1:54 p.m. No.11892553   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>11892512

What's really going to bake your noodle later on is, how long have we been living under martial law? Think about why Flynn even said it to begin with. All these criminals have been committing crimes.What little did they realize these crimes are punishable under US Mil courts because we've been under martial law this entire time.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 3, 2020, 1:56 p.m. No.11892571   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>11892525

Dunno. Handcuffs or parades?

 

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 8c541b No.5617724 ๐Ÿ“

Mar 10 2019 23:19:05 (EST)

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/12/us/nsa-shadow-brokers.html๐Ÿ“

@Snowden

Parades or Restraints?

[2019]

Q