Anonymous ID: b82a7a Dec. 3, 2020, 1:30 p.m. No.11892245   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11892039

What do you think "muh Russia" was about?

More specifically, they went for the dominion angle back then.

 

I believe this will be part of what becomes revealed. That the democrats did in fact try to set Trump up to be impeached as a foreign asset. Imagine if we were ready to violently defend the President and intelligence agencies were dumping data which showed 'the Russians' got him elected.

Even if members of the military disagreed with the action against us - the evidence would show that we were effectively supporting a foreign effort to subvert or attack our Constitution.

 

Remember that the people playing this game are not playing for shallow victories in office. They are playing for global domination and patriots - nationalists and libertarians - are their greatest enemy which they must orchestrate a military solution against to clear the board of obstacles to global dominion.

After that, it is a war to determine who wears the pants, but until then they will generally cooperate so long as we are seen as a viable threat to their end game.

Anonymous ID: b82a7a Dec. 3, 2020, 1:35 p.m. No.11892310   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11892071

But this time has been very different. At no other point in history have I seen people fight this hard or people become more convinced that the vote is a sham.

That is useful.

From the legal pathway, people are extremely adamant that elections need to be better conducted and observed.

But more interestingly, it convinces many people that the legal pathway is blocked by people who have been appointed, not elected - and who have no incentive to change the system.

Which means action by other means is on the table for them. Without this whole sham of an election, they would still think there was fraud, but not realize just how bad it is.

 

We need that. They need to understand that their government is a lie, is completelu out of control, and is not running even in their own interest - let alone following any adherence to the Constitution.

Anonymous ID: b82a7a Dec. 3, 2020, 1:39 p.m. No.11892360   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11892249

Why would we pardon him when he is in the hands of foreign adversaries who would arraign him on petty crime charges or manufactured rape charges?

Under our treaties, his crime against us takes priority.

It makes zero sense to pardon him until he is in our custody.

Further, it would also be better to acquit him of crime than to pardon him. Legal discovery in Assange's case would be absolutely amazing.

 

The people who have accused him knowing he did no crime need to be punished for the years they stole from him with their antics.