American Democracy Held Hostage by a CCP “Proprietary” Secret
We hear again and again from Democrats, turn-coat Republicans, lying media, and even Judges, who are presiding over the various lawsuits being brought by the loyal followers of Donald Trump, that “there is no evidence of fraud in the 2020 election”. They are of course depending on the fact they can skate through until the December 14th safe harbor date at which the State Electoral College delegations meet to vote by paper ballot (notice the irony) to cast votes for President and Vice-President. They are depending on what usurpers of Democratic systems around the World, and throughout history, have always depended on – that the voting public will eventually succumb to the feeling of helplessness, ennui, and inaction that usually befalls those who live in nations of great abundance, freedom and surrounded by rights.
For anybody who has listened to the words of the myriad of witnesses in the hearings in the Swing state, and who has read the text of the lawsuits filed in many of these states, the evidence is very compelling, and at least demands a thorough investigation. Of course, we could simply appeal to our logic to determine that there is something rotten at the core of the American voting mechanism.
Fundamentally, once you put a machine between the voter and the most important privilege in a Democracy – the election of the peoples’ representatives – the ability for human beings with their personal biases to intervene in nefarious ways increases exponentially.1 You are inviting that kind of manipulation. It is a matter of human nature. It is a matter of simple logic.
If the machine being used is made by a company (originally Smartmatic acquired by Sequoia Holdings in 2010; in turn acquired by Dominion Voting Systems that same year; in turn acquired by Staple Street Capital in 2018) which was purchased for $400M by a bank (UBS Securities) – and with patents collateralized (presumably in return for a loan) by HSCB Canada – a company (UBS) which is controlled by the Communist Party of China (CCP)2, that introduces a level of risk which is incontrovertible. This rises to the level of a National Security Risk. This too is a matter of simple logic.
If on top of that, the machine which is owned by the CCP, was made in Venezuela, for the express purpose of subverting and manipulating the Democratic vote of the electorate3, then only a fool, or a complicit traitor, would still argue that there is “no evidence” that should be investigated further.
Additionally, if there is evidence that the software, in the machine which was made in Venezuela and is owned by a company controlled by the CCP, was designed by Founder’s Group – a major Chinese technology conglomerate with connections to the military – would this raise any suspicions4?
https://gnews.org/615016/