Anonymous ID: 604377 Dec. 3, 2020, 8:26 p.m. No.11897417   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7691

>>11897291

 

Baker I salute you. Your Notables are concise, not filled with bs division anon postings.

 

You link correctly to the new bread so anons can see and visit important info they may have missed in the globals and notables.

 

ty old school Baker

Anonymous ID: 604377 Dec. 3, 2020, 8:37 p.m. No.11897557   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7569

>>11897380

 

Don''t be stupid. CONTEXT is everything. He made that statement relating to IF he "ever had a moral disagreement" with BARAK

 

How about an anon actually review old information before opining. This falls short of actual digging but maybe you can pull it off.