Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 4, 2020, 3:12 a.m. No.11899802   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9815 >>9816 >>9830 >>9884

Call to dig and dispute - "In 1,331 days, President Trump has made 23,035 false or misleading claims"

 

Do we have a pile of anons who will join in on digging through all the claimed lies and make a spreadsheet of what really is the fact and who it is who really lies?

 

In 1,331 days, President Trump has made 23,035 false or misleading claims

 

Would be a great dataset for memes and could be great as red pills to get normies to open theire eyes if you can show it systematic (propaganda).

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/trump-claims-database/

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 4, 2020, 3:20 a.m. No.11899835   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9853

>>11899815

 

You might see it as defense, but I actually would claim it IS offense.

 

Normies doesn't think the way we do. They are dismissing everything because the mainstream narrative for years…was reading through a dialog with a normie just now about how the person refuses to see things because of "Orange man bad", "He always lies", "Pathological liers are telling us something is wrong?", "Crazy Trump people", and so on…

 

They want them out of reach..

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 4, 2020, 3:38 a.m. No.11899876   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9883 >>9898 >>9900

>>11899853

 

Well you might be that faggot screaming the truth out loud while everyone is whispering "that's one crazy fuck" in each others ears.

 

I have always had the possibility to talk sence in to people with facts. But I se both myself and others now being shut down because they can't handle it anymore. "They are done.."

 

And this is with people on the other side who normally would be willing to listen to good arguments.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 4, 2020, 3:51 a.m. No.11899912   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9916 >>9935 >>9947

>>11899900

 

The normie don't need to read it, if it would be trending.

 

This faggot or telling the other faggots that we are screaming to normies without ears!

 

But I digress, might be other ways. But I still firmly belive we need an alternative route to normies minds…

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 4, 2020, 4:09 a.m. No.11899968   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11899935

 

I agree! And it was never about stopping this effort (Stop the steal movement) as I explained early (should have mentioned it in the first call out, but wanted to make it clean - and really thought most of us would catch that)

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 4, 2020, 4:18 a.m. No.11899993   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0221

HEY ALL!

 

How does it look? I mean with the election fraud being proven? Any one smarter than me and with more insight into current affairs could give, like, a percentage on the likelihood of Trump officially being acknowledged winner in time needed?

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 4, 2020, 4:44 a.m. No.11900146   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0220

Not sure if anyone remembers this. A while back, some Anon found out that if you hash various phrases, they show up as e-mail IDs on WikiLeaks. There are a bunch of different drops that this works on, including the Podesta and Clinton drops.

 

I hashed "Dominion" (no quotes used for the hash) and got these results with the corresponding algorithms:

 

Clinton Drop:

 

SHA1: https://www.wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/80F868A93B79BBD7579A52C9AF0A0E863F0F0D6A

 

SHA256: https://www.wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/7F4808AB6FB86C5060758B597F8B462E27429575F2845E349217A45E18F9532C

 

SHA512: https://www.wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/63D88922BEC8BBF1721BF6FAC7C6327D2544B6C502AD19B1928D8759027DA90D7A415743CD480CF33C9003C2DBD38301EE6E2AAC75D28AF75AA0ED587BDBBBF6

 

Podesta Drop:

 

SHA1: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/80F868A93B79BBD7579A52C9AF0A0E863F0F0D6A

 

You have to intend to make that match up. You're not just going to get a hashing match for a phrase like that to correspond to an e-mail ID on random. And, this happens many times over with various phrases.

 

Side note: What's the "17" for in Hillary's e-mail address. Strange coincidence, with Q=17. I checked and it's not hers, Bill's, or Chelsea's birthday.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 4, 2020, 4:49 a.m. No.11900186   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11899703

At the top of every bread

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here

At the top of every bread

Anonymous ID: 000000 Dec. 4, 2020, 4:56 a.m. No.11900220   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11900146

 

Here's some more, using the term "Kraken" and hashing it:

 

Clinton Drop: (at least one mentions Canada)

 

MD2: https://www.wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/314DE49C2325B7241D315A6DA34F14F7

 

MD5: https://www.wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/049A956DFEB0EB2E19C417A1DDE4D680

 

SHA1: https://www.wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/3515DC3DFE461AB124F0795172E3D7A59A678C6B

 

SHA512: https://www.wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/482BF9EFE1A765704B895773C60708139C7A2961D890B981D0884261182EC1F1758AA3F4B8809D794E3C5729F94618B931CE13D2A862310A78775E94F279A122

 

Podesta Drop:

 

MD2: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/314DE49C2325B7241D315A6DA34F14F7

 

MD5: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/049A956DFEB0EB2E19C417A1DDE4D680

 

Not sure why some algorithms are ignored for certain phrasing. I can't see any pattern so far.