>>11901070 (lb)
The proposition by people like that lawyer fella is to change the way Georgians vote before the runoff. What does it take to do this? If it's unattainable, why push it? Doesn't pass the smell test, and we're already swimming in evidence of fraud. A runoff ran the same way as the general will just add to the pool of evidence.
Make sense?
POTUS says vote
This anon will vote
Sometimes, the plan mirrors plans of those with bad intentions to trap them into being caught. Lin doesn't seem to understand this.
There it is. The stupidest fucking thing I'll read all day.
Thank you for all you do to help protect our country. I also respectfully, and adamantly disagree. Legalization in CO, for example, not only generates tax revenues for various educational and infrastructure projects, it opens markets, decreases for-profit prison revenues, removes the "glamour" or doing something bad for young people, and is much less harmful short and long term than alcohol which is a literal poison that causes numerous health problems.
Your biggest problem with weed is lack of education and research. Your second biggest problem with weed is people driving 25 under the speed limit.
t. Former CO anon.
Legalization increases the opportunity for you guys to bust the cartels that are circumventing the legal process in place. You cannot sustain criminalization of natural human behaviors, or use the justice system as a big brother to punish people for being harmless. What you can do is setup rules to govern responsible use, and severely punish the criminals that take advantage of legality to not only detain and prosecute, but boot those mother fuckers back over the wall. Renetry, at that point, becomes a matter of life and death for them.
Opportunities, fren. Again, thank you for your service. This exchange is proof we can disagree and still be cordial/respectful. Not all people that imbibe or "toke" are bad. Most, in fact, are good. The criminals are the target. Not the people.
Driving while under the influence should be punished; absolutely. It's reckless endangerment on top of many other things. Advocacy for legalization is not a tacit endorsement for irresponsible (dangerous) behavior. I really do hope people recognize the difference.
WE'RE REACHING LEVELS OF HYPERBOLE THAT SHOULDN'T BE POSSIBLE IN THIS REALITY
>Be blessed anon.
Same to you.
My mother is an alcoholic, and to this day doesn't have a relationship with her grandchildren because of it. I've had my struggles with substances, but I also understand and believe in responsible use. Human nature is human nature. Tempered use is key. More are capable of this people realize, and many feel that criminalization of that which comes natural to many isn't the right approach. As another post put it:
"treat addicts as a medical condition."
Someone's paying attention.
We all know that DUIs are over prosecuted.
I do not advocate for criminalizing weed or alcohol. I advocate for responsible enjoyment. You should read my other posts.
Holy Jesus. It's almost like people use God as an excuse to do stupid shit. You folks starting to wake up yet?