Welcome, bakers and anons. Continue the fight
where we left off.
Welcome, bakers and anons. Continue the fight
where we left off.
In other news, the Seven Dwarfs have been
advised that they can only meet in groups of
six. And one of them isn't Happy!
>In other news, the Seven Dwarfs have been
>advised that they can only meet in groups of
>six. And one of them isn't Happy!
Point taken. I do have a love of groaners. I simply
forgot to post the picture. Can I please, oh please,
oh please, have a pass on this, Mr. Posting Authority Figure?
Contractions, though a little more familiar in style,
are perfectly legitimate in the English language.
Prove me wrong.
Anon, we must all understand that guns are not
an answer until every means at the disposal of
good governance is exhausted. Those means
have not been exhausted, forgive me, by any
means. Stay strong, deliverance will come, one
way or another.
Do you know when life first breathes in the
human body, anon? Is it when blood oxygen
is first exchanged across the fetal border?
That is the essence of respiration is it not? And
besides, those of us who have not only read,
but studied the Bible know that God recognizes, Prophets (Read Jeremiah 1), Kings (Read Psalm 139), and the Christ (Read Luke 1). The baby is a baby from conception to
birth. If metabolism and respiration are the keys, there you go. If you can accept God's Word on it, there you go. Both Adam and Eve
were created as mature male and female
humans, so were given the breath of life in their
adult states. But they had all the equipment to
bring forth children, and I've already covered
enough Scripture on that subject to make it moot that God considers the mere conception,
which is all that child can be at that moment in
time, indeed a child. And science fiction images
are hardly adequate depictions of your defense
of abortion.
That's interesting news to me, anon. I just like
groaner jokes. Do you have any source for the
satellite system you mention?
How a person is comfortable in communicating
with God is totally between him and the Father
in heaven. But prayer, and even the mass, is a
one way street. I would suggest opening the Bible
for a chapter a day. Try the Gospel of John to
start. Just a chapter or two a day. Start listening
to God in His Word, and suddenly you have a
two-way communication going. God bless,
anon. I'm praying for you as I write this.
But how did we learn this alarming news, anon?
Because someone, who IS on our side, dug it
out, and made it known. Nothing worth having
is not worth working for. The work is being done.
Stay with it. Stay with us. Cheer, my friend
Thanks, anon. I'll do my own digging on it. You
never know what a bad joke is going to uncover
on this site. And thanks for all the substantiation
down line from others!
And a big thank you to you, as well, anon!
then abortion shud only be allowed in strict cases where the health of the fetus or mother is in question? The health of the fetus? Isn't mur-
dering the child just ever so slightly questionable
as regards the health of the fetus? So, state it
clearly, anon. You apparently approve of
an abortion when the convenience of society,
or the mother's desires, are at risk. The child
did not ask, never asks to be conceived. When
it is, it is a life. Share with me one Bible verse
that gives you the right as a human being to
decide when the fetus' best interests are served
by its own death? You can't. Basically if you
don't want abortions, keep your pants zipped.
Abstinence is the only 100$ effective birth
control there is on the planet, aside from killing
the child.
And which of the Anons personally examined the
pictured gentelman's blood, DNA, family lineage,
etc. Do any anons on the other board have PhDs
in those disciplines? Do you, anon. In case you
didn't bother to check, or didn't know, the DNA
of chimps and humans are incompatible. The
experiment was already attempted repeatedly
in Cold War USSR decades ago and abandoned
as hopeless. Or were you just pandering your
racist attitudes again. No place for that on this
board. WWG1WGA including our brown brethren.
Interesting, anon. How far would you say our DNA
must be altered to be considered non-human?
Not critical, just carrying the conversation to its
logical next step?