>>11905812
this, anon, is an exaple of when the shill makes up some tact of bullshit and then applies it to someone as if it's someone they observed in their life, or saw on television.
and even though the person is not anyting about what the shill is going on about, they persist that this narrative, which they are making up, or saw, is about the random person who them make into (let me say 'try to make into)
who they , the shill, tries to make into a victim as if they are this description, which is for someone else, and the supposed victim is not anything like that.
also here is the other point: the shill is so ridiculous in this line of shilling that it can not correct itself but will continue with it's false narrative even when they have no way of knowing anything about the person who they think they describe.
It's a schmere and veer , the shill basically drives into a wall with their narrative and quickly shows that they are either drunk, or a bot. most likely a bot.