Anonymous ID: 8db7d0 Dec. 4, 2020, 10:09 p.m. No.11910623   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0653 >>0704 >>0768 >>0954 >>1042 >>1098 >>1105

REPORT: Maxine Waters’ 2020 Campaign Paid Her Daughter A Cool $240K

 

By Mike LaChance

Published December 4, 2020 at 11:37pm

 

https://''www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/report-maxine-waters-2020-campaign-paid-daughter-cool-240k/''

 

Maxine Waters is a hypocritical, do-nothing member of Congress who has a real talent for using her position to enrich her own family.

 

During the course of the 2020 election, her campaign paid her daughter nearly a quarter of a million dollars.

 

Nice work if you can get it.

 

Rep. Maxine Waters’ daughter collected $240K from congresswoman’s campaign

 

The daughter of California Rep. Maxine Waters netted around $240,000 this past election cycle — from her mother’s own campaign, new records show.

 

The congresswoman’s campaigns shelled out payments to Karen Waters for work she did on her 82-year-old mother’s re-election campaign, including “slate mailer management” and “GOTV” — or likely “Get Out the Vote” services.

 

The payments appear in new Federal Election Commission filings reported by Fox News on Friday.

 

More than $212,600 in disbursements to Karen Waters are broken down into 26 entries such as “slate mailer management” fees, “office expenses” and “canvassing” between March 2019 and September 2020.

 

Another $28,150 in payments to Karen Waters occurred in October and November, for “GOTV” and “slate mailer management” fees — though one for $1,000 was simply labeled “Walker payments.”

 

What has this woman ever done for her district? Does anyone know?

 

How does she still have a job in Congress?

 

She does nothing but use her position to gain power and money.

Anonymous ID: 8db7d0 Dec. 4, 2020, 10:45 p.m. No.11910857   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0867

Five Fake Stories Social Media Didn't Suppress or Censor

 

BY MATT MARGOLIS OCT 16, 2020 12:32 PM ET

 

https://''pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2020/10/16/five-fake-stories-social-media-didnt-suppress-or-censor-n1063553''

 

Social media’s attempts to suppress and censor the New York Post’s bombshell report about Hunter Biden, as well as other damning stories about the Biden family’s corruption, have conservatives crying foul, and rightfully so. Big Tech censorship has become a huge problem, and when social media is actively trying to decide what the public should know about, it raises many questions.

 

But perhaps the first question that must be asked is: what stories were not suppressed or censored by social media despite being complete bunk? If social media companies think they have an obligation to prevent the public from seeing a story because of questionable or unverified sources or for being misleading, then is there any evidence that this standard is being equally applied across the political spectrum?

 

The answer to this question is easy to find. In a matter of minutes, I was able to find at least a dozen misleading or outright false stories, that were quickly debunked, that social media chose not to suppress in any fashion. Why not? Because the lie made Trump look bad. I’ve compiled just five of them below.

 

I should clarify that I’m not suggesting Twitter should have suppressed any of these stories. I am merely pointing out that the company has unequally applied its policies with a clear bias against Trump.

 

''Full page on attached PDF''