>>1191532

>>1191608

Hear ye Bible fags

The Bible was never canonized as being a complete works, and it is an unspoken dogma of Protestants that the Canon is the 66 Protestant books we have today. First century churches were collecting a wide array of texts, with being degrees of veneration and reverence.

Those considered "spurious" varied from church to church, as each church reflected the culture of each region and life, being tied in the baby threads of Evangelical tradition.

Catholicism was one of those threads, which formed a strong grip over all other traditions, with a specific political agenda, that costed those libraries their collections, to be centralized by Rome, and Byzantine.

>>1191690

>>1191690

The One True Church hears the voice of the Word in All Creation, and sees the eternal power and God-head demonstrated in all the things that have been made.

>>1191641

No, it was not included in Catholic renditions, and thereby not passed on to Protestants, and rejected because of a specific agenda to centralize theological debate into the hands of a few bishops and pastors.

>>1191592

No books we're officially banned though they were treated as heretical, and in certain regimes of the Western churches, there were very terrible consequences for these heresies.

>>1191777

>>1191777

Your right, Constantine did choose books to publish when he decided to be there first to condense the scrolls into a single codex (of which fifty copies we're printed).

But he did not choose what would be the chosen accepted 66. There are books missing in his codex, and there are books included that are not in the King James.

>>1191812

>>1191812

Bingo

>>1191859

I see you muh nigga