POTUS 2nd Re-Tweet timestamp:

(EST) 12:03:04 AM Dec 5, 2020

Notice digits are sequential: 1 2 3 4 5

That tweet has twitter video short-link that ENDS in T1 to TAKEOFF! https://t.co/AMIT0WetT1

POTUS 1st Re-Tweet timestamp:

(EST) 9:43:00 PM Dec 4, 2020

Re-Tweets DELTA is: 2 hours, 20 minutes and 4 seconds (2204) for which Q drop 2204 and mirror 4022 are provided.

Something else: Has any anons figured out what From means in POTUS Re-Tweet above?

I checked out the source From which is Team Trump and they only have one tweet with that video, but WITH COMMENTS!

IS THIS [From/without comments] A NEW TWITTER SUPPRESSION SCHEME?

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1335052022530379776

https://twitter.com/TeamTrump/status/1335049107359068161

>>11911598

For posterity, I am posting the original POTUS Retweet from Team Trump EXCEPT it's not a Re-Tweet after all. That explains my confusion.

It seems like From is shared resources being used.

Just another updated guess for Q Drop 4951.

Will Senator James Mountain Inhofe lose his job for holding up Section 230?

If not, [S]omeone else will get the pink slip.

A revised update on my guess for Q Drop 4951 which considers those letters to be departments.

"The Committee on Armed Services (sometimes abbreviated SASC for Senate Armed Services Committee on its Web site) is a committee of the United States Senate empowered with legislative oversight of the nation's military, including the Department of Defense, military research and development, nuclear energy (as pertaining to national security), benefits for members of the military, the Selective Service System and other matters related to defense policy."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate_Committee_on_Armed_Services

Senator James Mountain Inhofe is the current Chariman of SASC. He currently does not consider Section 230 to be a "grave threat to National Security - POTUS".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Inhofe

If Chairman of SASC gets the pink slip, then this stretchy guess is correct.

>>11911765

A question about my stretchy guess.

If Chairman James Inhofe does get the pink slip, would Jeff Sessions be next in line to helm that chair?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate_Committee_on_Armed_Services

>>11911830

>>11911765

Jeff Sessions considers Section 230 a grave threat to National Security, and (stretchy-guess) could be the next in line to replace current Chairman of SASC.

"TechFreedom has written extensively on the unconstitutionality of inserting the government into the exercise of editorial discretion by website operators. Just for example, read our statement on Sen. Hawley’s proposed legislation on regulating the Internet and Berin’s 2018 Congressional testimony on the idea (and Section 230, at that shit-show of a House Judiciary hearing that featured Diamond and Silk). Also read our 2018 letter to Jeff Sessions, Barr’s predecessor, on the unconstitutionality of attempting to coerce websites in how they exercise their editorial discretion."

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20200221/11290843961/why-section-230-matters-how-not-to-break-internet-doj-230-workshop-review-part-i.shtml

http://techfreedom.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Letter_-to-Jeff-Sessions-re-Social-Media-Bias-v2.pdf

The day after the Electoral College Votes on December 14, 2020 is the 229th Anniversary of the Bill of Rights.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Bill_of_Rights