Do it POTUS
It remains to be seen whether President Trump signs the defense spending bill for FY2021. It has quite a bit of things that benefit dems and warhawks but having firm control of the Pentagon, POTUS can get around some of them.
Confederate names to be scrubbed from bases
The bill includes a provision authored by Sen. Elizabeth Warren that directs the Pentagon to remove the names of Confederate generals from Army bases in three years. Trump previously threatened to veto the NDAA over any efforts to rename military bases.
Halting Trump’s hopes of a drawdown from Germany
The NDAA also seeks to squash Trump’s plan to move some 12,000 troops out of Germany. The plan calls for some to move elsewhere in Europe and others to the United States. The bill halts the Pentagon from cutting troop numbers below 34,5000 in Germany until 120 days after it sends an analysis to Congress on the impacts of a reduction.
Staying in Afghanistan
The NDAA seeks not to fund a reduction of troops in Afghanistan until the Pentagon assesses the impacts a drawdown would have on expanding terrorist safe havens and counterterrorism efforts. More than 2,300 Americans have been killed in Afghanistan and the war is 19 years old with no clear objectives or outlines for an end state.
https://www.stripes.com/news/us/congress-has-agreed-on-a-740-5b-defense-bill-here-s-how-it-impacts-pay-acft-space-force-and-more-1.654245
2 main issues here are that Republicans have refused to include removal of Section 230 protection from social media companies on the bill and Warren's provision of confederate names to be scrubbed from bases. One of these or both are likely going to trigger VETO from POTUS but the big question after that is whether enough Republicans side with dems to override President Trump's VETO. So far both parties have given unanimous support for this FY21 bill. I want to avoid concern fagging as much as I can but why the heck does it seem like after the election not enough Republicans are supporting President Trump at exposing voter fraud and now they support a bill which benefits dems/warhawks the most? Did you suddenly lose your backbone or what the heck is wrong with you? SUPPORT YOUR PRESIDENT AND DON'T BACK DOWN LIKE A COWARD
Lin Wood actually said couple of days ago during press conference he saw the real numbers and President Trump won California too and got 410 electoral votes so your picture is indeed very accurate.
It's lose-lose situation either way but getting his VETO overridden by his own party is going to hurt him much more than weighting in whether his VETO has enough support before using it or not using it.
Do you mind to explain? I only see 2 scenarios here:
1: Trump doesn't VETO it and loses because he didn't get Section 230 included and Warren's provision was passed
2: Trump does VETO it but enough Republicans side with dems to override it, thus showing Republicans are not unified and directly went up againts the President.
And the reason why I'm doubting Republicans is because they have given unanimous support for this bill so the chances are enough of them will vote to override President Trump's VETO. So how exactly do you see anything positive with this, no matter how it turned out to be?
That's the guy who made original Q video and another version of it. Nothing to do with E. What he said is correct though and DOJ also made other changes. One of them being authority for executions was taken away from prison warden and given to director of US marhals and director of BOP. Many other steps were made to fast-track federal executions and everything can be read here:
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/11/27/2020-25867/manner-of-federal-executions
Are you saying when President Trump does VETO it, by the time they are voting to override it, all voter fraud has already been exposed everywhere and this means when new congress starts in January, many seats are going to switch from DS RINOs/dems to honest patriots who really won the election? Well I didn't really think of this aspect so thanks anon.