Anonymous ID: adb81c Dec. 5, 2020, 7:37 a.m. No.11913321   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11913295

 

No. It was in his twitter feed early this week. President Trump said section 230 must be abolished because it's a big threat to our national security. His words: I will veto it.

Anonymous ID: adb81c Dec. 5, 2020, 7:42 a.m. No.11913356   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11913300

>Why is he uncovering things about Republicans?

 

Not republicans, RINO's. Think about it. What can MSM say about it? Outing corrupt RINO's first is brilliant tactics. Optics.

Anonymous ID: adb81c Dec. 5, 2020, 8:15 a.m. No.11913527   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3579 >>3623

>>11913459

>Do you mind to explain?

 

Not at all. Look what President Trump is doing. He's showing dems, republicans, MSM, social media tech, who's boss. That would be 'We The People'. How much time we talking about between when the bill is sent to him, he vetoes it and the Legislature votes to override it? A lot is going to be revealed in that time. Throw Barr, Durham and the Supreme Court into the mix too.

Anonymous ID: adb81c Dec. 5, 2020, 8:21 a.m. No.11913558   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3568

>>11913528

 

The Supreme Court's calling a new national election is definitely on the table. The SC looks at the evidence presented, realize the election was completely compromised and sees that (a new election) as the only option.

Anonymous ID: adb81c Dec. 5, 2020, 8:28 a.m. No.11913608   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3624

>>11913568

>Under what law?

 

Under the Constitution of the Republic of the United States of America. As to a case: Don't believe there is one, we've never has this large scale election fraud before.