>Did you suddenly lose your backbone or what the heck is wrong with you?
They are owned, Anon. Bribes or blackmail. Someone has leverage on just about everyone in both parties. They didn't lose their backbone - they are in place for just this type of situation and are doing their master's bidding.
>you all just overlook the failed predictions that came before
Your 'you all' reference is ambiguous and inaccurate, Anon.
Q posts. Anons speculate. Speculations by anons have proven unfounded many times, especially speculations about dates.
Some anons do indeed overlook or ignore the speculation of other anons. How many of us ignore the datefags. You don't know, yet you use a few posts by datefags to attempt to define all of us.
Anyone can post here. How can you know who posted 'failed predictions'? How can you know who took those 'predictions' seriously? You can't.
>I really can't "unsee" this:
I can't make any sense of it other than some lines connect random bits of text and numbers. There is no analysis and no apparent meaning to this graphic. Sorry.
>If the SC orders a completely new election
How could SCOTUS order a completely new election, Anon? Do you have a case in mind?
Ignore cycle threshold guidelines and over-amplify the samples.
Under what law? Can you cite a case?