Anonymous ID: 6f0205 Dec. 5, 2020, 9:01 a.m. No.11913839   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11913807

>Maybe because the Chinese aren't really in control of China.

>Who helped create China under Mao?

>Elite bankers ordered the cheat of the 2020 election… and have been using this cheating system for decades against the people of the World.

>This is a National Defense issue.

Anonymous ID: 6f0205 Dec. 5, 2020, 9:11 a.m. No.11913912   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3926 >>3928 >>4238

Appeals court rules for Trump taking military money for wall

 

HOUSTON (AP) — A federal appeals court ruled Friday that a lower court was wrong to bar the Trump administration from taking $3.6 billion from military construction projects for a border wall.

 

A panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said that El Paso County and the nonprofit Border Network for Human Rights did not have the standing to challenge President Donald Trump’s redirecting funds from more than 100 military construction projects, including a $20 million road project at a base located in the city. The appeals court found that neither the county nor the Border Network proved it was directly harmed by Trump’s move. The court reversed a December 2019 ruling by U.S. District Judge David Briones.

 

Trump took roughly $6 billion from military funds under a national emergency he declared in early 2019 after Congress refused to fully fund his demands for wall funding, leading to the longest government shutdown in history.

 

President-elect Joe Biden has pledged to end that national emergency, though the Trump administration has locked in construction contracts with the funding and already built many new stretches of wall across the southwest border.

 

The U.S. Supreme Court has already agreed to review a different ruling on the use of military construction funds. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals previously agreed with a coalition of border states and environmental groups that contended the transfer of money was unlawful and that building the wall would pose environmental threats.

 

In its order Friday, the 5th Circuit said it disagreed with the 9th Circuit’s ruling and would “decline to follow it.”

 

https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-courts-de3448091bd56541acad9789d3e2ad96

Anonymous ID: 6f0205 Dec. 5, 2020, 9:14 a.m. No.11913928   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3945

>>11913912

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4b8e5c No.4031007 📁

Nov 25 2018 21:37:32 (EST)

Border Security = National Security.

FY 2019 Defense Spending Bill

https://dod.defense.gov/News/SpecialReports/Budget2019.aspx📁

>>Budget Overview

Budget Reconciliation

https://www.countable.us/bills/hr7073-115📁

What if the House fails prior to majority change?

What vested auth does the Constitution grant a sitting President re: matters of NAT SEC?

Thank you, Mr. Soros.

Q

Anonymous ID: 6f0205 Dec. 5, 2020, 9:18 a.m. No.11913965   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Anonymous ID: grTMpzrL No.147434025 📁

Oct 31 2017 22:00:47 (EST)

There are more good people than bad. The wizards and warlocks (inside term) will not allow another Satanic Evil POS control our country.Realize Soros, Clintons, Obama, Putin, etc. are all controlled by 3 families (the 4th was removed post Trump's victory).

 

11.3 - Podesta indicted

11.6 - Huma indicted

 

Manafort was placed into Trump's camp (as well as others). The corruption that will come out is so serious that deals must be cut for people to walk away otherwise 70% of elected politicians would be in jail (you are seeing it already begin). A deep cleaning is occurring and the prevention and defense of pure evil is occurring on a daily basis. They never thought they were going to lose control of the Presidency (not just D's) and thought they had control since making past mistakes (JFK, Reagan).

 

Good speed, Patriots.

PS, Soros is targeted.

Anonymous ID: 6f0205 Dec. 5, 2020, 9:38 a.m. No.11914096   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4158

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.

 

~Ben Franklin

Anonymous ID: 6f0205 Dec. 5, 2020, 9:46 a.m. No.11914158   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4185 >>4238

>>11914096

Shutdown backlash: San Diego mayor says there's 'no science' behind Gov Newsom's lockdown and sheriff insists he won't be 'blackmailed' into enforcing strict orders as 8.5M Bay Area citizens brace for month-long stay-at-home order starting Sunday

 

California Governor Gavin Newsom’s latest coronavirus lockdown restrictions are getting a strong push back from mayors, lawmakers, and sheriffs who say banning outdoor dining and closing children’s playgrounds are unnecessary and ‘not supported by science.’

 

San Diego Mayor Kevin Faulconer, a Republican who is said to be planning to challenge Newsom for the governorship in 2022, said the Democratic governor’s moves are stoking ‘anger and frustration.’

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9021369/amp/Shutdown-backlash-San-Diego-mayor-slams-Governor-Newsoms-statewide-COVID-19-lockdown.html