>>11916491

This ends COVID-19.

They have been intentionally elevating the cycle threshold. They have exceeded the recommended number of times to amplify the sample. So, even if you had an exceedingly small indication that you had COVID-19, they ran the test over and over until you showed positive.

>>11916735

>Is there something significant about the number?

Honest question, Anon. Did you ask that because you have the impression that understanding the Q material requires you to decode stuff?