>>11920904 (pb)

>This could explain the PANIC

There were posts on stories about her on Twitter saying Raffelsperger had had the surveillance video a month ago but never released it.

If true, it best explains her reflex reaction that, "It's been debunked already."

The other committee members said, "This has just been released", and Pick corroborated that it was the first public showing.

IOW, Parent had seen it before and coughed the "debunked" shit up inadvertently (in panic) when she saw Pick had the video. My take anyway. I think the other boys in that room figured that out, too.

Looks like this one could be a manic bitch who will take everyone else involved out with her with knee jerk denials that only prove her guilt.

>>11921670

Sidney Powell's suits are about fraud, which wouldn't be affected by dates ascribed to election procedure.

Also, if this is a coup, especially with foreign actors, POTUS and the military are in charge of protecting the country. Any judicial means/tactics meant to support the coup are irrelevant. Bad guys have an army of lawyers deployed to do that. It was part of their plan. Dates are meaningless.