you get the curse back. you own it. It's yours.
my take is that someone who posts a discusting vagina image like you do is a worthless troll not worthy of an honest opinion.
troll, you get your curses bounced back at your sad sap self.
you realize that most of these who call on Mary and Angels and Jesus are just mocking Catholics here, right?
It's not me who will come with your nemesis, troll.
you shoyuldn't worry about me, I'm just telling you what you do to yoruself by disrespecting the people of this board by posting what you posted.
you are saying evil things, anon, not that you yourself are evi, right?
you just parrot out the evil that you need to to feed the demons who scream inside your head.
does that make you evil?
you're an idiot and possessed by ill intention.
you'll get your payback too.
no, anon,it's is you who must defend your own bigoted narrow view and hatefulness.,
but not to me.
you must have founded that centre for your own use.
but delete all the tracking data.
you don't need all the stuff starting with the question mark, anon.
It's the story season of preChristmas when . . . daunt da dnaaannn
people get visited by . . .
three ghosts . . .
and the ancients had a similar theme: the daughter of Justice.
you get the shit scared out of you and reform.
that's not crazy, it's an old story.
PS: Steve is awesome, I get a good vibe from him
just a point about suitcases or coolers full of ballots: dont' they have any kind of . . . security?
I mean you enter a public building and we know that suitases or coolers could have . . . explosive devices? So how does a cooler full of ballots get past a security guard unless they knew about it too?
and wouldn't they also have cameras, if there is security, where the security people are?
so many many people had to not only know, but also assist. I suppose that is why they say that there are THOUSANDS of affidavits saying what people saw. And it makes it seem as though there was at least a coordinated campaign of something going on.
I suspect that mean-girl bully bit that they did lost them this. It's just that we can feel for the poll workers who were supposed to watch, but were told to piss in a bottle and given the shutup-stupid routine.
it must have made those people even more determined to testify . . . .
in anyone were ever to audit the maintenance budgets of old VAX 1000 legacy systems, what would they find tacked onto the costs of things . . .
those old machines sometimes get budget but they never get plugged in anymore.
cool.
and then they were looted by the usual suspects and gave all their innovation over to Microsoft and capitulated to the marxists.
fortunely we had Richard Stallman thinking things through before hand . . . .
Q does not discuss the banner image.
the idea that it was a 'directive from Q' does not compute.
what anon see are discord shills saying that, and attacking those who dare to say that the image was commonly used.
And so, since the attack seems like bully shill bullshit, the anon naturally rally around the TRUTH, meanwhile digging on Q when Q posts and understanding that when the breads are hard to find, you who go on about Q directives and banner images usually aren't in the breads.
and that tells us something.