No the document lists the title if 1591 and 1594 which include tje words "child sex trafficking". Its like a oaragraph listing different tyoes of drugsyou can smuggle. Doesnt mean you smuggled all types.
The count 1 and 2 do not include the word child. Could mean there will be a deperate count for that.
And no. I have not mentioned this in another bread. But i think the anon stepping on the break here is right.
Again. Thats not the indictment but a mere quote of the LAW that was broken.
The count is further below and more specific.
Think of it like a case of smuggling.
The law says Smuggling of Cocaine, Heroine or LSD. And it will be lusted even if you only smuggle LSD.
Dont get me wrong. I think they are guilty of child sex trafficking too. Maybe eben murder. The problem is I dont see her indicted for that. Only vount is for Sex trafficking by fraud and conspiracy for sex trafficking by force or so.
If you show me a seperate law that is used for sex trafficking of adults I stand corrected.
Again. You mustake the broken LAW cited in the introduction with the actual COUNT listed below.
Yes. The law does say CHILD. No. That does not mean the count is on CHILD trafficking. Could be also sex trafficking by fraud.
Punishment is equal. Thats why its listed under 8ne Number.