Anonymous ID: e0d2f4 Dec. 7, 2020, 8:28 a.m. No.11935516   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11935426

hasn't everyone got it by now? I didn't read the nyt article, but I'd bet money they didn't use a named source, let alone two, as used to be standard. we are in the age of rumor and propaganda by the press. one of their cronies in the gov called a reporter and gave them this hot story, and the reporter and editors went with it, because they thought it would help the cause, not because it is true. or maybe the nytimes are panderers as well as propagandists, and just wanted to please their readers.

 

why don't you fucks still to reporting? like, when something happens, give us the details with quotes of people who were there, on the record. is that so hard, to wait for something to happen and then tell us about it?

Anonymous ID: e0d2f4 Dec. 7, 2020, 8:30 a.m. No.11935560   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11935515

this. but if you can install a couple of people at the top who think the woke ideology is the way to go, everyone below has to fall in line

whoever is going woke is just betting that the power and money will be controlled by the wokesters

of course they don't give and actual shit about anything else