tried to embed a video which is a meeting of the Education and Skills Committee from the 30th of September 2020.

Topics being discussed include;

>Education and Skills Committee

>September 30, 2020 10:17

>Duration: 2 hours 12 minutes 6 seconds

>1. Decision on taking business in private: The >Committee will decide whether to take agenda >items 3 and 4 in private.

>2. Redress for Survivors (Historical Child >Abuse in Care) (Scotland) Bill: The Committee >will take evidence on the Bill at Stage 1 from—

>Donald Henderson, Deputy Director, Redress >Relations and Response Division, Paul >Beaton, Unit Head, Redress Relations and >Response Division, Lisa McCloy, Bill Team >Leader, Redress Relations and Response >Division, and Barry McCaffrey, Lawyer, >Scottish Government Legal Directorate, >Scottish Government;

>>and then from—

>Dr Maeve O'Rourke, Lecturer in Human >Rights Law and Programme Director, BCL >Law and Human Rights, National University of >Ireland Galway.

>3. Redress for Survivors (Historical Child >Abuse in Care) (Scotland) Bill: The Committee >will consider a list of candidates for the post of >adviser in connection with the forthcoming bill.

>4. Review of evidence: The Committee will >consider the evidence it heard under agenda >item 2.

Point to note is No'1 which is for having points 3 and 4 discussed in private (meaning you, the public/taxpayer, who is paying for it all don't get to hear those ones)

I will post 2 subsequent meetings of theirs after this one.

>>12027609

video here…

https://www.scottishparliament.tv/meeting/education-and-skills-committee-october-7-2020

sorry struggling to work out how to embed this one.

>>12027730

Education and Skills Committee hearing from Ocober 7 2020 meeting here:

https://www.scottishparliament.tv/meeting/education-and-skills-committee-october-7-2020

Again, apologies for being unable to work out how to embed it, please feel free if you are more capable of working out how to do so for all 3 videos.

>Education and Skills Committee

>October 07, 2020 08:45

>Duration: 2 hours 59 minutes 31 seconds

>1. Decision on taking business in private: The >Committee will decide whether to take items 3 >and 4 in private.

>2. Redress for Survivors (Historical Child Abuse >in Care) (Scotland) Bill: The Committee will >take evidence on the Bill at Stage 1 from—

>Kim Leslie, Representative of the Association of >Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL) and a partner >at, Digby Brown LLP;

>Una Doherty QC, Faculty of Advocates;

>Iain Nicol, Solicitor and Convenor of Civil >Justice Committee, Law Society of Scotland;

>and then from—

>Joanne McMeeking, Head of Improving Care >Experiences, CELCIS;

>Judith Robertson, Chair of the Commission, >Scottish Human Rights Commission (SHRC);

>Gaynor Clarke, Chair of Historical Abuse >Practice Network, Social Work Scotland (SWS) >and Programme Manager at, Aberdeen City >Council;

>Janine Rennie, Chief Executive, Wellbeing >Scotland.

>3. Work programme: The Committee will >consider its work programme.

>4. Review of evidence: The Committee will >consider the evidence it heard earlier.

>>12027890

Education and Skills Committee meeting from October 28 2020

https://www.scottishparliament.tv/meeting/education-and-skills-committee-october-28-2020

Content includes:

>Education and Skills Committee

>October 28, 2020 11:01

>Duration: 1 hour 48 minutes 1 second

>1. Decision on taking business in private: The >Committee will decide whether to take item 6 in >private.

>2. Declaration of interests: George Adam will be >invited to declare any relevant interests.

>3. Subordinate legislation: The Committee will >take evidence on the Children’s Hearings >(Scotland) Act 2011 (Children’s Advocacy >Services) Regulations 2020 [draft] from—

>Maree Todd MSP, Minister for Children and >Young People, and Tom McNamara, Head of >Youth Justice and Children's Hearings, Scottish >Government.

>4. Subordinate legislation: Maree Todd, Minister >for Children and Young People to move—>S5M-22706—That the Education and Skills >Committee recommends that the Children’s >Hearings (Scotland) Act 2011 (Children’s >Advocacy Services) Regulations 2020 [draft] be >approved.

>5. Redress for Survivors (Historical Child Abuse >in Care) (Scotland) Bill: The Committee will >take evidence on the Bill at Stage 1 from—

>David Whelan, and Harry Aitken, Former Boys >and Girls Abused in Quarriers Homes;

>Flora Henderson, Future Pathways;

>Helen Holland, and Simon Collins, In Care >Survivors Service Scotland (INCAS).

>6. Review of evidence: The Committee will >consider the evidence it heard under agenda >item 5.

>Most Recent Archived Meetings

>>12027992

Again I note that all videos are having private discussions, not open to the public…..there could be many reasons for this, including the extradition and arrest of John Watt Q.C. The retired SCOTTISH Judge extradited for trial on charges of child abuse of 3 girls and one boy. One of the girls (all are now adults in their 40's or 50's) was the daughter of one of John Watt's colleagues Suzie Henderson on which I have posted quite a few times on the previous board.

I won't comment on these for the moment except to say that the Redress Bill which they are discussing will not be implemented in this Parliament and this anon believes it was never intended to be: which is why, I believe the "waiver" of rights to further court action was included, so that it would not pass, and would have plenty of objections to ensure that there would never be enough time to implement it, each bill has to pass 3 stages before it can be passed and this is only stage 1.

It was always meant to fail; to push the can down the street a little bit and waste more time………..

…….TIME IS THEIR GREAT ALLY as I have said often in my comments on articles posted.

String it out long enough and there will be no-one around to share the truth of any matter, neither victim or abuser–and it is the abusers they are protecting

>>12027992

>>5. Redress for Survivors (Historical Child Abuse >in Care) (Scotland) Bill: The Committee will >take evidence on the Bill at Stage 1 from—

>

>>David Whelan, and Harry Aitken, Former Boys >and Girls Abused in Quarriers Homes;

>

>>Flora Henderson, Future Pathways;

>

>>Helen Holland, and Simon Collins, In Care >Survivors Service Scotland (INCAS).

Little Flora was drafted in from Canada, another country under the Crown and with its own fair share of paedophiles in power allegedly with none other than their Prime Minister Justin Trudeau one of the higher ranking ones.

Yes she was drafted in at approximately 120,000 a year salary to a newly started up company called "Future Pathways" which was given £15 million of taxpayers cash to distribute in aid of victims of Historic Child Abuse and I can assure you they done everything they could to drop the cost of everything a victim asked for.

"Future Pathways" started with 3 victim support staff when the first award of 5 million was made and their staff increased to around 30 in time for that cash award being upped to £15 million.

All of those support workers were on around 80,000 per annum and some of those higher up the ladder getting more, with Flora reported to have been drafted in to front this newly formed company ( it didn't exist before the inquiry, it only started up in time to get the huge cash handout, allegedly for support of victims….

…as if

There were at the last personal count ( around a year ago ) 26 victim support agents on around 80,000/year = 2 million and 80 thousand, per year in wages, add Flora's 120 grand in to the mix it's 2.2 million plus office rental for 2 plush offices (one in Glasgow and another in Edinburgh) plus other staff including office staff, secretaries etc and you must be pushing on costs of 3 million/year probably not including expenses or the cost of all the new smart phones/tablets etc for staff.

Let's just settle on 3 million per year in costs, then expenses for staff………..anyway let's just for the sake of argument call it 3 million/year and believe this anon when I tell you they are very miserly with abuse victims and when they do allocate some monies for victim needs they try to give you the cheaper options and chop you down more. I've seen all this first hand.

IF ANYONE WAS HAS TIME AVAILABLE PLEASE LOOK IN TO "FUTURE PATHWAYS" I AM SURE IT WILL TURN UP SOMETHING TO DIG IN TO THEM.

Little Flora doesn't give a shit about victims of that you can be sure, however if I wasn't attached I'd certainly give her the sausage…..she's a hot little minx in the flesh and has a trim little bod……she reminds me of one little chick from my past who was really in to S&M, loved being spanked, If I was still available she'd be on a spanking.

I had considered some negative commentary on some of the other panel members for this meeting of the Education and Skills Committee, but as they seemed to some extent to redeem themselves I will hold fire, unless I see them slip backwards. Everyone deserves an opportunity for redemption.

>>12028705

Good money for a startup company if you can get it.

>>12027609

Discussing the "waiver" aspect of the redress scheme….

I have to say I am impressed particularly with Alex Neil and Ian Gray, neither was given enough time to speak and make their point/s.

I don't vote in elections as a rule, but if I were ever to vote these 2 gentlemen seem to have some substance.

https://www.scottishparliament.tv/meeting/education-and-skills-committee-september-30-2020?clip_start=10:30:54&clip_end=11:03:49

Again can't seem to embed the link, if anyone can do so I'd be obliged, and if so perhaps a lesson on embedding links from there would help for future ref.

thanks

>>12235930

Scottish sun newspaper online headline.

JAG DRAG Coronavirus Scotland: Frontline medics still waiting for vaccine as ‘non-clinical staff get jag’

https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/scottish-news/6466856/coronavirus-scotland-nhs-frontline-workers-vaccine/?utm_source=spotim&utm_medium=spotim_conversation#comments

Comments on the story pointing out the fakery of NHS "non-clinical staff" story, highlighting the blue safety cover on the needle.

Here is the statement received from Michael Russell, find attached the first 4 of 42 pages from that statement with added comments

https://www.childabuseinquiry.scot/media/2663/michael-russell-witness-statement.pdf

the past Minister for "Education and Lifelong Learing", by Lady Ann Smith (Are you really a lady Ms Smith?). She is the Chair of the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry - still ongoing, supposedly though it rarely sits and takes evidence as you can see from the following Times on Sunday article bearing the following headline:

Slow pace of Lady Smith's Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry upsets survivors

I am sorry I cannot show the whole article, I haven't even read the whole article as I do not have a sub to their online paper. If anyone can reply to this post with a full copy of the article that would be much appreciated.

As you can see from the attached screenshot of the article (part of) up until the date of publication of the article (sept 15 2019) the inquiry had only took evidence for 50 days of that year until mid-September. This woman is on a salary of approx £250,000 and up until September of 2019 out of around 250 days they only sat taking evidence for 50 of them.

Does anyone think this right?

I fucking don't…

The secretariat to the inquiry is (I am led to believe, but cannot myself confirm so assistance by others to prove or refute the claim would be helpful) none other than the daughter of Lord Cullen, who headed the Dunblane Inquiry into the shooting of children in a primary school by a man named Thomas Hamilton. The findings of that inquiry have been put under lock and key for 100 years (At the time this period of 100 years was unprecedented, usually anything until then that was removed from the public through secrecy acts and legislation was for 30 years, what was in their findings that they have hidden it from you all for 100 years?) by the Establishment, because it covers up for child abuse by the very same establishment-they did so using the services of Lord Cullen. These people are not conducting a "public" inquiry at all, they decide what to publish on their website and tell you so

>"We can decide what facts are established."

…conversely they can also decide which facts are not established and can withold anything they want from the public…

>"We are a public inquiry. Where possible, >hearings will be held in public. In some >situations the Chair may decide to hold a >hearing in private or in a way which keeps >private the identity of the witness."

When any information is withheld from the public in a "public inquiry" can it still be termed a public inquiry? They can and do decide what to allow to be heard there, my very good friend has still never been invited to give his evidence or many others like him, who have been tortured by the state as children.

Statement from Michael McMahon to the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry (SCAI).

https://www.childabuseinquiry.scot/media/2641/michael-mcmahon-witness-statement.pdf

Link to Michael McMahon's Statement from the previous board

>>11928612

5 pages from his statement on that post followed by another 3 pages of his statement, all with comments by this anon included on this link >>11928693

>>12357567

Yes that is correct as was post >>11928612

I too was unable to see the attachments which is a bitter pill to swallow as I had posted much good info there………….what is going on that it is unavailable?

https://www.childabuseinquiry.scot/media/2663/michael-russell-witness-statement.pdf

Pages 5-9 of Michael Russell's statement to the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry as past Minister for "Education and Lifelong Learning"

I'll try to find the time tomorrow to continue posting on some of the other pages (42 in total) . I'm tired and wondering what is the point of posting here if there is no copy of board 1. What a waste of time and effort to post at all if it just disappears into the ether….there seems to be little interest and few visitors according to the baker from the last board.

Continuation of the statement of Michael Russell to Lady (are you really a Lady Ms Smith?) Ann Smith, chair of the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry (SCAI) to determine why it took so many years for such an inquiry to be ordered. Pages 10-14 with comments.

https://www.childabuseinquiry.scot/media/2663/michael-russell-witness-statement.pdf

>>12356781

>Slow pace of Lady Smith's Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry upsets survivors

>

>I am sorry I cannot show the whole article, I haven't even read the whole article as I do not have a sub to their online paper. If anyone can reply to this post with a full copy of the article that would be much appreciated.

>

>As you can see from the attached screenshot of the article (part of) up until the date of publication of the article (sept 15 2019) the inquiry had only took evidence for 50 days of that year until mid-September. This woman is on a salary of approx £250,000 and up until September of 2019 out of around 250 days they only sat taking evidence for 50 of them.

>

>Does anyone think this right?

>

>I fucking don't…

>

>The secretariat to the inquiry is (I am led to believe, but cannot myself confirm so assistance by others to prove or refute the claim would be helpful) none other than the daughter of Lord Cullen, who headed the Dunblane Inquiry into the shooting of children in a primary school by a man named Thomas Hamilton. The findings of that inquiry have been put under lock and key for 100 years (At the time this period of 100 years was unprecedented, usually anything until then that was removed from the public through secrecy acts and legislation was for 30 years, what was in their findings that they have hidden it from you all for 100 years?) by the Establishment, because it covers up for child abuse by the very same establishment-they did so using the services of Lord Cullen. These people are not conducting a "public" inquiry at all, they decide what to publish on their website and tell you so

>

>>"We can decide what facts are established."

>

>…conversely they can also decide which facts are not established and can withold anything they want from the public…

>

>>"We are a public inquiry. Where possible, >hearings will be held in public. In some >situations the Chair may decide to hold a >hearing in private or in a way which keeps >private the identity of the witness."

>

>When any information is withheld from the public in a "public inquiry" can it still be termed a public inquiry? They can and do decide what to allow to be heard there, my very good friend has still never been invited to give his evidence or many others like him, who have been tortured by the state as children.

>>12361813

>Pages 5-9 of Michael Russell's statement to the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry as past Minister for "Education and Lifelong Learning"

>

>I'll try to find the time tomorrow to continue posting on some of the other pages (42 in total) . I'm tired and wondering what is the point of posting here if there is no copy of board 1. What a waste of time and effort to post at all if it just disappears into the ether….there seems to be little interest and few visitors according to the baker from the last board.

Michael Russell statement to the Scottish child abuse inquiry…pages 15-19

>>12356781

>https://www.childabuseinquiry.scot/media/2663/michael-russell-witness-statement.pdf

>

> the past Minister for "Education and Lifelong Learing", by Lady Ann Smith (Are you really a lady Ms Smith?). She is the Chair of the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry - still ongoing, supposedly though it rarely sits and takes evidence as you can see from the following Times on Sunday article bearing the following headline:

>

>Slow pace of Lady Smith's Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry upsets survivors

>

>I am sorry I cannot show the whole article, I haven't even read the whole article as I do not have a sub to their online paper. If anyone can reply to this post with a full copy of the article that would be much appreciated.

>

>As you can see from the attached screenshot of the article (part of) up until the date of publication of the article (sept 15 2019) the inquiry had only took evidence for 50 days of that year until mid-September. This woman is on a salary of approx £250,000 and up until September of 2019 out of around 250 days they only sat taking evidence for 50 of them.

>

>Does anyone think this right?

>

>I fucking don't…

>

>The secretariat to the inquiry is (I am led to believe, but cannot myself confirm so assistance by others to prove or refute the claim would be helpful) none other than the daughter of Lord Cullen, who headed the Dunblane Inquiry into the shooting of children in a primary school by a man named Thomas Hamilton. The findings of that inquiry have been put under lock and key for 100 years (At the time this period of 100 years was unprecedented, usually anything until then that was removed from the public through secrecy acts and legislation was for 30 years, what was in their findings that they have hidden it from you all for 100 years?) by the Establishment, because it covers up for child abuse by the very same establishment-they did so using the services of Lord Cullen. These people are not conducting a "public" inquiry at all, they decide what to publish on their website and tell you so

>

>>"We can decide what facts are established."

>

>…conversely they can also decide which facts are not established and can withold anything they want from the public…

>

>>"We are a public inquiry. Where possible, >hearings will be held in public. In some >situations the Chair may decide to hold a >hearing in private or in a way which keeps >private the identity of the witness."

>

>When any information is withheld from the public in a "public inquiry" can it still be termed a public inquiry? They can and do decide what to allow to be heard there, my very good friend has still never been invited to give his evidence or many others like him, who have been tortured by the state as children.

>>12361813

>Pages 5-9 of Michael Russell's statement to the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry as past Minister for "Education and Lifelong Learning"

>

>I'll try to find the time tomorrow to continue posting on some of the other pages (42 in total) . I'm tired and wondering what is the point of posting here if there is no copy of board 1. What a waste of time and effort to post at all if it just disappears into the ether….there seems to be little interest and few visitors according to the baker from the last board.

>>12448330

> Continuation of the statement of Michael Russell to Lady (are you really a Lady Ms Smith?) Ann Smith, chair of the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry (SCAI) to determine why it took so many years for such an inquiry to be ordered. Pages 10-14 with comments.

>>12362738

I hope so>The board is archived, might be just my configuration won't allow me to get the images.

>

>Scotland #1: https://qanon.news/archives/x/10843151

Thanks, I hope you are right.

>>12368768

>>>12356781 (You)

>

>Pretending to save the world

I'm not pretending to do anything JJ, I am merely fulfilling an obligation to do my part to put the world right…..I surely done my bit over the years to turn it in to what it is now.

as you say…..often…..the last act of rebellion against a system you know to be wrong is to be a good man.

Thanks for your input, others may not appreciate your posts but I find them very informative. I can't keep up … time is in short supply, so much to do, so many others to consider. I promise to try to work harder. ;)

>>12429914

>The satanic ritual child abuse in Scotland is more pervasive than in any other country inthe world.

The Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry (SCAI) appears to be key to me anyway….not just to Scotland. It doesn't seem to be progressing under the present Chair Lady (are you really Ann?) Smith and I don't like the smell of Lord Cullens' daughter overseeing and reporting back to daddy……..lots of Lords involved in the cover up, far too many for my liking!!

I like my lords and ladies to be on the side of truth and protection of innocents. Protection of all, not just their wealthy and powerful peers.

What is a Secretariat?

Definition of Secretariat:

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=definition+of+Secretariat

Screenshot 1

Screenshot 2

https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/129452/what-is-the-definition-of-iat-in-commissariat-secretariat

>>12356781

>>12448330

>>12453545

>>12454581

Was anyone able to find out if the Secretariat for the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry (SCAI) is the Daughter of "Lord" Cullen?

Does she have something to do with someone keeping secrets?

>sēcrētārius -> sēcrētāriātus ‘having to do with someone who has to do with secrets’

Is it just me? Should there be a place in a "Public Inquiry" for a "keeper of secrets"?

Allegedly the daughter of a Lord no less, one who committed a previous Inquiry (Dunblane) and its findings to a 100 year "Government Secrecy" order?

Info on Lady (are you really Ann?) Smith, Chair of the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry SCAI and 2 others, the secretariat and the "Solicitor to the Inquiry".

Screenshot 3

https://www.childabuseinquiry.scot/about-us/the-inquiry/who-we-are/#3-how-we-work

This screenshot shows that they decide what is put in front of the Inquiry, and conversely, that which is not…

Screenshot 4

….which may explain the slow pace of the Inquiry to date, evidenced by the final screenshot with the headline

Slow pace of Lady Smith's Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry upsets survivors

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/slow-pace-of-lady-smith-s-scottish-child-abuse-inquiry-upsets-survivors-p69gz56qz

>>12356781

>>12361813

>>12448330

>>12453545

>>12454581

>>12482682

>>12521029

>>>12482682 (You)

>

>Ireland I know but may tie in

>

>Originally General Research #15983 >>12518530

It does tie in. It all ties in everywhere:

England

Scotland

Ireland

N. Ireland

Australia

Canada

NewZealand

Denmark

Sweden

Holland

Many more, and all of them involving self-procaimed "authority" of Government officials, church leaders and Royalty.

We really do need a New World Order, one which never gives so much power to individuals EVER again. The power should always lie in the (free thinking) people.

Attached is page 20 of the statement received from Michael Russell to Lady Ann Smith of the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry...whether or not she is really a Lady remains to be seen, we won't know until the end of the Inquiry for sure, though due to her slow-walking of the Inquiry and her removal of Advocate Halley from his post after his public refusal to be complicit in the cover-up of Crimes against children from his own peers, I'm leaning toward the conclusion that she isn't really a Lady.

It's the only page of Michael Russell's statement I am posting up on the board today, I think it is appropriate to draw the attention of the reader (if there are any/many) to the importance once again of Judicial collusion in the cover up of Institutional Child Abuse in Scotland. The colluding Judge in this instance is also a "lord" and is our old friend Lord Brian Gill who we have looked at before...it is time to take another look at this pretentious, entitled and self-serving old fuck and his appearance on the Scottish Parliament's Public Petitions Committee on Petition PE1458 calling for a register of interests for judges.

This former Lord President and Lord Justice General of Scotland is so conniving (and it shows if you watch it all the way through, very evidently) and creepy that I swear if the guy got up out of his chair, instantly turning into a bat and flying toward the door, before magically transforming to a wisp of smoke and disappearing out of the keyhole; I honestly would not blink a fucking eye.......got to be one of the creepiest fucks I have ever came across. Dracula has nothing on this cunt!

https://youtu.be/GMlBc9XNxrc

Incidentally, he was succeeded when he retired by this guy, Lord Carloway also in the following video giving evidence on the topic of judicial interests.

I can't get my head round the fact fuckers like these are ruling over us on behalf of the crown, horrible little fucks and if they told you to do something in the street you'd hit them a boot in the arse and tell them tae get tae fuck, so why do we allow it in the important aspects of our lives.

You can find out much more on

http://petercherbi.blogspot.com/

Thank you Peter for all the info on these corrupt fucks.

https://youtu.be/L33BZAu6L0Y

you have to watch these to see what low-life cunts we are allowing ourselves to be ruled by

>>12564903

I just want personal independance from political, royal and judicial whores. All these bastards sell out humanity for money and power over the rest of us.

Nationality is just another divisory tactic to rule over us.

>divide…………..and rule.

>>12572072

Page 20 of Michael Russell's statement to the public inquiry….did not appear on previous post for some reason.

>>12576179

I come here to help a friend get some information out on the State and Medical abuse he suffered as a child. At the moment he is still awaiting his opportunity to "publicly" give evidence, which so far he has been unable to do (the latest reason being convid). They are not even scheduled to take evidence from him as their next focus is to be on private boarding schools. You'd think State torture would come pretty high up on the list…but so far has not. Therefore I intend to keep posting about the Inquiry itself and all the people who have been left out of the remit of the inquiry, many of them Judges and politicians, as well as other Senior Civil Servants, and all employees of the Crown.

I have other reasons but that is the reason for my focus on the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry is primarily to help a friend and inform others as to how evil and corrupt are those that think they rule me…they don't. Yes they could have me offed (or covid'd as I now refer to "suiciding" someone) but I really don't give a fuck. I have loved ones and I want a better future for them.

What about you?

Why do you come here?

>>12595034

Yeah. About that being "anonymous" on the net thingy…..nobody is anonymous on the net. The State knows exactly who everyone on the internet posting anonymously are, they can check all of the stuff on your pc no problem without even visiting you. If a "ragamuffin" like me knows that, then you do too. I'm under no illusion regarding others being able to access my hardware ;)

2 stories from today's newspapers.

Saturday 23/01/2021

One from the Scottish Mail and the other from the Times (Scotland).

Scottish Mail headline reads..

Pressure piles on Crown Office

Scottish mail Saturday 23rd January 2021 by Michael Blackely (Scottish Political Editor).

Holyrood…>”has taken steps to compel the Crown Office to hand over key documents.”

>“MSPs on the inquiry committee have invoked >special powers which can force the release of >correspondence.”

>The notice to the crown office says it (The >Crown Office) “may hold documents relevant >and necessary for the committee to fulfil its remit.”

>”The committee wants WhatsApp messages >between a senior SNP official, Susan Ruddick, >and Scottish ministers, special advisers or civil >servants sent between August 2018 and >January 2019 that may be relevant to the >inquiry to be released.”

>”The Crown office was given until 5pm on >January 29 to respond to the notice.”

It occurs to me that those same powers could be used to compel similar evidenciary material in relation to the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry from senior SNP MSP's in relation to their dialogue with "special advisers or civil servants" which always seemed to end up "against" an Inquiry in to such State abuse of children; like this one (advisor, not in favour of child abuse inquiry, due to "time" constraints) in my previous post >>12572072 >>12573229

>Page 20 of Michael Russell's statement to the public inquiry

Dracula, Lord Brian Gill, as an advisor suggested by none other than fatty arbuckle himself (Salmond) to Michael Russell; to seek legal council from regarding a potential Child Abuse Inquiry.

The 2nd story I've uploaded is the same subject matter, covered by

Kieran Andrews (Scottish Political Editor) for the Times Scotland 23/01/2021

Inquiry demands evidence held back from Salmond court case.

>It is the first time that Holyrood has used the >powers of section 23 of the Scotland Act, >which can force an individual “to produce >documents, concerning any subject for which >any member of the Scottish Government has general responsibility”.

This writer also drawing attention to the demand for

>“…release of the legal advice from external council…”

He quotes Jackie Baillie, Scottish Labour’s interim leader as saying

>“Enough is enough—the secrecy must end.”

Yes Jackie. It does.

Section 23 of the Scotland Act has to be used immediately by Lady (are you really?) Smith, chair of the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry (SCAI) to demand material evidence of correspondence between MSP’s and “special advisors and civil servants” which always resulted in the advice being to refuse an inquiry, by Lords and Genteelfolk (what-what?)

The hand holding up the Mail article belongs to His Boggley-eyed(ness) the Chief Guinnea-pig, who is still awaiting being called up to give "pub lic" evidence at the Public Inquiry, into State abuse of children in care over a lengthy period probably since the 2nd world war; but only allowing those abused after 1964 to obtain Legal aid to bring it to light.

>>12576153

>>>12573071 (You)

>

>You can’t even write English

You are probably right. I confess to only ever having finished primary school.

I dodged school in secondary and was expelled eventually mid-way through 4th year, having spent very little time there productively. I have no qualifications from that time whatsoever.

I've never paid income tax and I'm knocking on a bit.

Who the fuck would want to pay for their own enslavement?

an article from dailyrecord.co.uk

24/01/2021

Scottish Labour leadership contender Anas Sarwar accepted £4000 donation from firm owned by convicted paedophile

https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/millionaire-sex-offender-gave-4000-23374250

"Scottish Labour leadership contender Anas Sarwar accepted a £4000 political donation from a company owned by a convicted paedophile.

The MSP was given the money by Ali Najafian’s A&G Investments Ltd to fund his successful campaign to be party deputy.

Iranian businessman Najafian admitted a catalogue of sex offences against young girls in 1992.

A 12-year-old victim was so traumatised she tried to take her own life three times and had to undergo psychiatric counselling.

Anas Sarwar will compete against Monica Lennon for the role of party leader after Richard Leonard stood down earlier this month

Related Articles

Najafian – who has 18 company directorships – instructed lawyers to threaten to go to court and get a gag order preventing us from revealing details of his past and his cash gift.

The 64-year-old property tycoon owns A&G Investments with brother Gholam.

He has been at the centre of controversy several times over the years – including a cramped labour camp filled with Eastern European workers being found on his land.

As well as the donation in 2011, Najafian’s firm has given £8000 in total to Scottish Labour – a further £2000 went to its Glasgow Central branch in 2010 months before Anas took over the seat from his dad Mohammad Sarwar – along with £2000 to the wider party.

A spokeswoman for the Electoral Commission confirmed it is the responsibility of political parties and individuals to check if donations come from a permissible source.

There is no suggestion that Sarwar broke any electoral rules.

Married dad-of-three Sarwar, 37, is running against Monica Lennon to become Scottish Labour’s next leader after Richard Leonard stepped down earlier this month.

He admitted having met Najafian at party events and knowing his nephew but claimed he was unaware of the convictions.

Sarwar said: “I had no knowledge of these abhorrent revelations from 30 years ago about a director in a company which donated to the Labour Party and my campaign a decade ago.

“I am angry about this and any insinuation that I would have ever accepted this donation with that knowledge is deeply distressing.

“It is also upsetting, and I feel not a coincidence, to see this surfacing in the week I have launched my campaign to reunite the country – but that only makes me more determined to change our politics and rebuild our nation.”

Despite calls for Najafian to pay compensation to his victims in 1992, the taxpayer paid the bill for a criminal injuries award after his appearance at Hamilton Sheriff Court.

He was sentenced to complete 200 hours of community service and one year’s probation.

In 2005, a site housing Polish labourers in cramped conditions was uncovered by firefighters at a farmhouse which was owned by Najafian at the time.

Some 30 workers – five to a room – were lodging in portable cabins on Greenfield Farm, near Eaglesham, Renfrewshire.

Ali Najafian's farmhouse in 2005

Firefighters found the squalid digs after being called to a blaze at the property and a local authority probe was launched over claims the accommodation block had been erected without permission.

At the time, Najafian said he had rented the farm to a German firm and had no idea it was being used for accommodation.

In 2006 Najafian was again at the centre of controversy over plans to pull down a play park on land he owned.

He had bought the plot in Barrhead five years earlier – while the play equipment was owned by East Renfrewshire Council.

The businessman closed the site because talks aimed at giving him an alternative piece of land broke down and he wanted the council to pay him rent.

When we contacted Najafian on Friday he said: “Please please, I swear to God I have never done anything wrong in my life, I have got a daughter, I have got corona.”

The sex offender appeared in the Sunday Mail after admitting a catalogue of horrendous offences against young girls

His legal team said they planned to take the Sunday Mail to the Court of Session within 24 hours in a bid to have our revelations blocked via an interim interdict.

However, they later climbed down and dropped the threat.

>>12689310

Thanks man, I think I forgot to say that to you since Sunday (nearly a week ago). I guess I got distracted (not difficult to do), thanks for pointing that stuff out.

>>12737562

Ideally you'd just be able to hover over them with your cursor and see what info is in them and that they'd be clickable links….I guess that was what I was trying to achieve when the baker suggested a Scottish board and I pestered him to transfer my original postings from the UK boards; so that anything I put up could be easily connected to whatever else I was going to post in future.

I still don't even know how to open a linked post if it is a green link rather than a red one. I've just never been able to make the time, to work out how to better navigate the boards.

>>12782413

…and yet they are unable to effectively run the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry; through the same pandemic?

>>12783139

apologies, attachment not meant for this post, nor for this topic.

They are imploding…all throwing each other under the bus.

>>12688910

>Kieran Andrews (Scottish Political Editor) for the Times Scotland 23/01/2021

>

>Inquiry demands evidence held back from Salmond court case.

>

>>It is the first time that Holyrood has used the >powers of section 23 of the Scotland Act, >which can force an individual “to produce >documents, concerning any subject for which >any member of the Scottish Government has general responsibility”.

>

>This writer also drawing attention to the demand for

>

>>“…release of the legal advice from external council…”

>

>He quotes Jackie Baillie, Scottish Labour’s interim leader as saying

>

>>“Enough is enough—the secrecy must end.”

>

>Yes Jackie. It does.

>

>Section 23 of the Scotland Act has to be used immediately by Lady (are you really?) Smith, chair of the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry (SCAI) to demand material evidence of correspondence between MSP’s and “special advisors and civil servants” which always resulted in the advice being to refuse an inquiry, by Lords and Genteelfolk (what-what?)

>Page 20 of Michael Russell's statement to the public inquiry

>>12573229

I seem to be having problems posting anything…

If this posts up, the first 3 attachments are pages 21-23 of Michael Russell's statement to the Chair of the SCOTTISH CHILD ABUSE INQUIRY (SCAI), with comments from a clown with nought but a primary school education! Apologies for the coffee stains, but still readable.

the 4th one is a screenshot from CELSIS (fucked if I can be bothered checking to see what it stands for, it's populated by cunts in the pockets of Government…as JJ keeps posting"it is hard to understand something when your salary DEPENDS on you NOT understanding it") "about us" page, an organisation set up to receive public funds (YOUR BLOOD, SWEAT AND TEARS-TAXATION, FINES ETC) for the deliverance and services to those who were abused as children dating back to the 50's and beyond by the STATE and religious organisations. Most of their funding went on their own salaries, those and other organisations, including FUTURE PATHWAYS.

https://www.celcis.org/about-us/sircc/

The final attachment is the content of the "about us" from the LEECH organisation called Celcis's website, with comments.

>Page 20 of Michael Russell's statement to the public inquiry

>>12361813

>>12356781

>>12448330

>>12361813

>>12453545

>>12573229

All the other links are here in the bun

>>12689310

WAKE THE FUCK UP SCOTLAND, YOU ARE NOT GOVERNMENT, OR ROYAL PROPERTY, YOU ARE NOBODY'S PROPERTY! WHY DO YOU LET SCUM LIKE THESE LYING FUCKS IN GOVERNMENT AND THE JUDICIARY RULE OVER YOU….YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO CONTROL THEM, NOT THE FUCKING OTHER WAY AROUND!

I can't resist putting the links to our old pals Gill and Carloway, just to show you what total and utter wankers are governing you.

I wouldn't have employed either of these fucks, even to lick my arse clean after a severe bout of the shits, not even the height of the CONVID propaganda when they kidded you all on there was a bog-roll shortage and supposing I'd completely run out of toilet paper!

Grow some fucking balls … all of you.

Scotland the brave? my arse. A nation of compliant clowns. When will you all get it? Will you wait until the government or the health service order you to eat your own shite because "it cures convid"?

If they said that publicly there are no end of you who will comply in great, greedy handfuls. Some of you will wear nappies to catch the shite, some will trade in it, some will fight over who gets to eat the shite………….cos let's face it, you have all been eating up the Governments shite for the last year.

I don't even know why I bother trying to inform you all, perhaps you are all just the "useless eaters" the government think you are?

I have never been so embarrassed to be a Scot, I have never been so embarrassed to be human. The world is full of fucking morons swallowing all these blatantly obvious lies about virus's. How come a CUNT like me with no education can see it is all pish and all of you are walking about like zombies complying with this crap?

MORONS

Anybody complying with any of this shit is aMORON

>>12939739

Sorry forgot to add links to carloway and gill, two absolute tadgers who are among those who RULE OVER YOU!

https://youtu.be/L33BZAu6L0Y

https://youtu.be/GMlBc9XNxrc

Foreword of case study 4 in attachments

A pic of Lady Anne Smith chair of the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry (SCAI).

I do like the look of her. I don't know why, all I know is I feel hopeful looking at her. Time will tell.

https://www.childabuseinquiry.scot/media/2668/scai_case-study-no4_the-provision-of-residential-care-for-children-in-scotland-by-the-christian-brothers_february-2021.pdf

4th case study by the Inquiry…all in total vindication of survivors…the same survivors who have taken part in an ongoing inquiry (SCAI), which in Lord Gill's view, should not be allowed on the basis "…it would take too long. His experience of inquiries was that an inquiry was not the right way to proceed with an issue such as historical abuse of children in care because it would not "satisfy people."

"He was one of the people who felt that if we went down that route we would be sucked into a swamp."

From page 20 of Michael Russell’s statement to the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry here…………

>>12573229

Newsflash from His Boggley-eyed(ness), the Grand Chieftain of the Guinea-pigs, who himself was tortured as a child with ECT and subjected to drug trials, by people claiming themselves to be “Health Authorities" while under the "care" (they didn't care) of the STATE…

“The crown office has intervened in the removal of the private submissions by Alex Salmond to the convener of the Scottish Parliament. Those submissions were made public last night the 22nd of Feb. 2021 by the Scottish parliament committee led by Linda Fabiani, Convener of the committee investigating the Salmond/Sturgeon affair, they were withdrawn this afternoon 23/2/2021, at the request of the Lord Advocate, James Wolfe QC at around 2:30PM. He apparently suggested it would not be in the public interest for them to be made publicly available on the Scottish Parliament website. Alex Salmond’s legal council have advised the committee that they and Mr Salmond will not be turning up tomorrow as scheduled to give evidence, in protest of his submissions being disallowed.”

Any anon with an ability to find those submissions on a way back internet thingummy bob and submit them here would be appreciated.if they exist…the chief test subject, his boggley-eye(ness) believes the submissons to have been published yesterday, I myself am not sure, I certainly did not see them, or read them.

The following from today’s news, probably “Reporting Scotland”, which I heard over the telephone this evening…

Nicola Sturgeon, described the Aberdien meeting as "fleeting" but, didn't tell government officials till 2 months later, while claiming it to have been an SNP Party meeting, which would not require minutes to have been taken; in contrast with a Government meeting where minutes “would” have to have been taken!

Her husband, Peter Murrell, told a quite different version of events when he was questioned in Parliament 3 weeks ago, when he said he felt it (the meeting between Mrs Murrell aka Nicola Sturgeon and Geoff Aberdein) looked like Government business and didn't intervene.

BBC Scotland covered it, just finished…heard it on the phone, I don't have bbc…I don't have tv tbh…not sure what it was called but around 11pm…if someone could post a link to it that'd be great.

2nd attachment scotsman newspaper article regarding murrell testimony from 8th February 2021

https://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/alex-salmond-inquiry-snp-chief-executive-absolutely-refutes-perjury-accusations-3127390

3rd attach

Alex salmond redacted, daily record 50 second newsclip at url:

https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/politics/alex-salmond-inquiry-submission-taken-23549706

All this talk of the crown, which is not the queen, it is an institution, it is not Her Majesty, who I somehow feel is going to be one of the good guys when all has been said and done.

>>13034821

>10. In doing so, I would note that it does not serve the public interest if the independent process of examination of the Ministerial Code (which I introduced as First Minister) is predetermined, or seen to be predetermined, by a restrictive remit given by the Deputy First Minister.

Kind of like the remit for the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry (SCAI), where there was also a "restrictive remit" given. One which conveniently left out those in high office from being subject to scrutiny, within, politics and the Judiciary and all the way to the top of society.

We really need all of humanity to unite and bring about the fairer system that we all know is within grasp.

You can have a microchipped future retaining the status quo it would seem, only with all of you masked and several metres apart and subject to "medical treatment" (aye right, how did your ancestors get by without vaccines?) you don't want, and certainly don't need: or you can work together to change it to something better.

One thing is for certain…..we do need a New World Order, just not the one with rulers or owners of men. I still say make Jamie Blandford the new King. The Duke of Marlborough has led a life that has brought him in to contact with ordinary people and knows their trials and tribulations.

It has been suggested that the Queen is due to retire in April this year, if so, we will have a new Monarch, the question is who?

>>13034821

>11. A restricted investigation would not achieve its purpose of genuine independent determination and would undermine confidence in what has been a useful innovation in public accountability.

>

>12. I would accordingly urge Mr Hamilton to embrace the independence of his role and the express assurance given to the Scottish Parliament by the First Minister that he is free to expand the original remit drafted by the Deputy First Minister and to address each of the matters contained in this submission.

>

I would strongly suggest expansion of the SCAI remit too. I won't hold my breath though.

>>13068812

A Rabbi's 31 reasons for not taking the vaccine.

31 Reasons Why I Wont Take the Vaccine

The following list was created by the Israeli rabbi Chananya Weissman.

Originally published by Baron Bodissey, Feb. 2, 2021. By Narrow Gate on Feb. 9th.

No racial or religious group is responsible for the shape of our existing world. There would, it appears, seem to be people from all groups, racial, religious or otherwise who are intent on causing upheaval to the whole of mankind; many more from all groups fail to take issue with "one of their own" and contribute to the failings of their own particular group/s by failing to challenge things that are plainly unacceptable and detrimental to the majority.

Most God fearing people are good, no matter what their religion or skin tone.

I have been down the Jewish rabbit hole, the Catholic rabbit hole and many others in the last 40 odd years. I find that those who truly believe in God fear Him. Those who fear Him are motivated to put others first and try and see life from their eyes; empathy as opposed to apathy.

Thank you Rabbi Weismann for taking the time to write down what many of us are in agreement with but, perhaps fail to articulate as well as you have.

God bless you Sir.

>>13078017

Forgot to add the source.

https://www.cleansingfire.org/2021/02/a-rabbis-31-reasons-for-not-taking-the-vaccine/

Alex Salmond testimony to the committee

Can't seem to embed sorry.

https://www.scottishparliament.tv/meeting/committee-on-the-scottish-government-handling-of-harassment-complaints-february-26-2021?clip_start=12:31:45