>>1194519

>https:// www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release

Looks like the "watch list" was created right at the time of the JFK murder. And the reasoning for it? Person is a danger to a government official.

Get it: They find out who fucking killed Kennedy or tried to cover it up ?

So the reasoning behind the watch list

"We are so guilty. They are going to be angry with us and maybe want to do us hardm [bring us to Justice]

So they should be on a watch list and maybe rounded up at some point. ?

Seems that this cache of JFK records would consist of ones that Fell through the cracks per earlier Bush family purges [W. Bush destroyed a lot of documents] and that were withheld in the past because of their content.

What more do people want to know, that they don't know already?

Truly we already have all the data "You have everything" It's analysis which is important. All the data in the world means nothing if people look at it and can't put together the pieces.

>>1194765

"Fact" lol

No one can prove anything to anyone else.

They have to see it for themselves

A major game is to claim something is not proved in order to muddy the waters.

"MOSTLY we want other people to have no other option but to accept the TRUTH as FACT. "

This is BS. You can't force anyone to know anything because you claim the status of "fact" and "truth"

You 're just waiting for them to announce it on TV.

>>1194918

Mostly because if you're actually read up on the subject you already know about it.

The sheep are just clamoring for "proof" because they've been told / convinced that "Nobody knows" "We'll never know for sure"

If you look for "knowledge by authority" if the authority is trying to fuck with you? You end up like the fuking sheeps [good for food] we are surrounded by.

Famous line by a peripheral 9/11 data point

"Y'all will end up like Perdue Chickens"

I perused the file for one minute and already found something , second from the top of the drop of today.

There's an old tale. "Principle of the drunkard's search"

"The streetlight effect is a type of observational bias that occurs when people only search for something where it is easiest to look.[1][2][3][4]

It is also called a drunkard's search, after the joke about a drunkard who is searching for something he has lost:

A policeman sees a drunk man searching for something under a streetlight and asks what the drunk has lost. He says he lost his keys and they both look under the streetlight together. After a few minutes the policeman asks if he is sure he lost them here, and the drunk replies, no, and that he lost them in the park. The policeman asks why he is searching here, and the drunk replies, "this is where the light is".[2]

The anecdote goes back at least to the 1920s,[5][6][7][8] and has been used metaphorically in the social sciences since at least 1964, when Abraham Kaplan referred to it as "the principle of the drunkard's search".[9]"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streetlight_effect

They've been setting people out to search for the "smoking gun" for years.

And whatever people come up with they are always told "But that's not a smoking gun"

It's a joke.

People use the TV set [and by extension the rest of the controlled Media which function as a re-enforcement to the accepted versions] as their authority.

The work has been done. The Zapruder film was doctored. The definitive books were all written in the 90's - but the hang-out disinfo never stopped with their Propaganda