>>11943909

>Agnostic

That word doesn't mean what you think it means.

You are told a definition of the word, but you need to understand those parts to get a feel for the whole.

[They] do this all of the time and I could give you loads of examples.

You would do well to learn etymology, to understand how suffixes and prefixes work and learn how to better understand syntax in general.

prefix "a-":

Greek says "away from, off"

Latin says "without, not"

gnosis:

Greek says "(inner) knowledge"

Agnostic means "without knowledge".

>>11944315

should be lb

>>11944460

Atland was west of Africa and east of Americas.

A Deluge caused it to submerge. The Deluge was caused by melting ice buildup in the north and south poles.

>>11944474

Yes, social consensus doesn't disagree with you.

I'm showing you what's underneath though, anon. Better understanding how words are developed will help you understand what the words mean and how they're actually used.

Words are spells, anon. You are told they mean one thing, but plenty of them mean something else and this has a much more practical application to your life than you might be willing to believe.

Let's do an example: what do you think the word Apocalypse means?

It means the end of the world or something, right?

Now go study its etymology. You might be surprised.

>>11944511

[They] desire themselves gods.

In reality, if we arrange ourselves psychologically, we just might be something like what most normies think a "god" is.

Normies tend to have a meager definition of "god".

In reality, all of us have aspects of divinity within us. The question is actually whether or not we can put it to meaningful use such that we become "god-like".

Cue the "muh blasphemy" diatribe. Maybe it would help to explain the distinction people I'm familiar with make between "Creator" and "God"…