Reposting because the thread reached bump limit.

>>119203

This is not the original source of the image Q posted. It has a different filename (starting with C; the one Q posted starts with D). If you put the filename of that copy of the image from that Twitter account in as an image url, it shows up. When you replace that filename with the filename of the one Q posted, it isn't there. That means either the original source of the image that Q saved is gone or Q changed the filename. If it's from a different source than that Twitter account, and if it's important to find the original Twitter account that posted it, I don't know if we'll be able to find it because it seems they deleted it if they posted it.

>>119565

I also thought it was interesting that it started with "DUG" but both that filename and the filename of the Twitter post people thought was the original source are 15 characters long.

>>119593

That was fake. Someone made it out of that Q post. Don't spread it (I swear I'm not a shill).

>>119614

Hey you should read this >>119546

>>119581

Do you mean that's the filename you get when you open the image from the linked Twitter post, or that you typed the filename from Q's version of the image in and it worked? This is the filename I get when I open the picture from the linked Twitter post.

>>119626

Yeah, that was Q's filename. What do you mean? I'm saying they have different filenames, so if it's useful to find the original Twitter post it's not the one from that link.

>>119677

That's irrelevant. Q posted a picture from Twitter, so if they're leading us to a particular Twitter post, it might be useful to track it down, wouldn't you think?

>>119697

I don't know why it didn't work for me then, but that means the picture Q saved still exists on Twitter, so we might be able to find the Twitter post.

>>119729

Sure, but that doesn't give us the actual tweet the picture is from, does it? Do we have to track down every instance of this image and look for the one with the same filename as Q's post, or is there a way to find which Twitter account posted a picture based on its filename or something else?

>>119769

Should we be looking for the original Twitter post or is that irrelevant?

>>119877

>releases IT ALL>

> >

Has that character meant anything in Q posts in the past? No coincidences.

>>119903

Anon, read the other posts. What I've been saying this whole time is that the image in that Twitter post is not the exact image Q posted (Q posted a cropped screenshot with different numbers of retweets etc), so if we want to track down the exact Twitter post Q saved that image from, it's not the one in that link.

>>120050

Interesting that you would continue to dump here instead of /greatawakening/. Does that mean you're leading up to something that involves our input?

>>120226

Not if he has this enabled. It also means we'll know if a new tripcode is real.