>>11946741 this video overlooks the complaint Sidney filed.
She specified crimes and people who committed them. She put them in a position to answer in their official capacity for crimes the committed personally.
She knew was was never going to survive dismissal. Her complaint has evidence attached which Lawyers don't usually do. They write their pleadings with enough specificity to survive a summary Judgement.
Now when it goes to SC, that evidence is part of the record and will be reviewed by SC for the merits.
To further the point about the criminal aspect of this, civil cases with a criminal element that have not been adjudicated in a criminal Court are stayed pending the outcome in the criminal Court.
When litigants sign pleadings or responses, they are signing under oath.
The crimes alleged would need to be responded to by the very people accused of them. If they signed a response they waive their 5th amendment . They could not later come back in a criminal trial and invoke it.
Sidney requested a declaratory judgment for several things. Those things were the equivalent of asking a judge to declare the actions crimes and find they took place in this election. The end result would have been for a judge to indirectly find Kemp and others named guilty of crimes in which they have not been charged with yet.
She knew she wasn't getting to 1st base. She supplied the merits in the pleading and now the SC will review everything that is part of the record.
The SC will write an opinion regarding the reasons the case was dismissed and kick the case back down to be heard on the merits in accordance with their findings.
because of the problems for Kemp and crew listed, a stall game will go on because they cannot respond unless Sidney is lying and they are safe to say no crimes committed.