Anonymous ID: 876f4d Dec. 8, 2020, 4:40 a.m. No.11947795   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7926 >>7930 >>8048 >>8289 >>8410

Breaking — Texas files election lawsuit against Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin at Supreme Court…

 

Posted by Kane on December 8, 2020 3:10 am

 

The State of Texas filed a lawsuit directly with the U.S. Supreme Court shortly before midnight on Monday challenging the election procedures in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin on the grounds that they violate the Constitution.

 

 

Texas argues that these states violated the Electors Clause of the Constitution because they made changes to voting rules and procedures through the courts or through executive actions, but not through the state legislatures. Additionally, Texas argues that there were differences in voting rules and procedures in different counties within the states, violating the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause. Finally, Texas argues that there were “voting irregularities” in these states as a result of the above.

 

 

Texas is asking the Supreme Court to order the states to allow their legislatures to appoint their electors.

 

 

“Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in voting. The Defendant States flooded their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are lawfully received, evaluated, and counted. Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election less secure in the Defendant States. Those changes are inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution.”

 

 

“This case presents a question of law: Did the Defendant States violate the Electors Clause by taking non-legislative actions to change the election rules that would govern the appointment of presidential electors? These non-legislative changes to the Defendant States’ election laws facilitated the casting and counting of ballots in violation of state law, which, in turn, violated the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution. By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution.”

 

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/12/07/texas-sues-georgia-michigan-pennsylvania-and-wisconsin-at-supreme-court-election-rules/

Anonymous ID: 876f4d Dec. 8, 2020, 4:43 a.m. No.11947816   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Ron

@CodeMonkeyZ

· 10h

Everyone thank the #DominionWatch team on the ground that helped keep Georgia honest!

Now litigation has moved onto the next phase and people on the ground will be less effective going forward, so it is ok to disband for now.

Great job in uncovering some dirty truths!

 

https://twitter.com/CodeMonkeyZ

Anonymous ID: 876f4d Dec. 8, 2020, 4:52 a.m. No.11947865   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7926 >>7979 >>7991 >>8010 >>8048 >>8289 >>8410

'''Adjudication is where major fraud may have occurred.

Scanner settings can be setup to require most ballots to be adjudicated.'''

Two poll workers can decide voter intent of an adjudicated ballot.

Dominion reps can approve adjudicated ballots without review.

 

Check the AuditMarks!!

 

Its possible to set the scanner settings to require adjudication for almost every ballot. Seems they may have done that here.

 

Need to check the AuditMark to know which votes were changed for which candidates.

 

https://twitter.com/CodeMonkeyZ/status/1336125344563150849

https://twitter.com/kylenabecker/status/1336039589828554755

Anonymous ID: 876f4d Dec. 8, 2020, 5:20 a.m. No.11948014   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8068

>>11947930

Supreme Court knows about 2016 Delegate Recount Scam and the methods of the Corrupt DNC/Dems

 

there are several points to litigate, hopefully SC rolls many up to address things.

one point like in PA that SC should be justified to look at (and is) is when PA Supreme Court makes rulings/or fails to make them when it appears the PA constitution is being violated.

 

ONE IMPORTANT note, re. Supreme Court is there was a ruling in Faithless Electors that (like Q, but really noone else) addressed the Delegate Recount SCAM.

 

point being is that SC Justice Kagan mentioned it in a unanimous ruling, and it was a DNC/Obama etal, usurpation of Constitutional Norms. SC understands imho that they need to protect the Republic, and the will of the people from Dem lawfare and underhanded conspiracies.

 

NY Times article (archived):

http://archive.is/Ddkxp

Anonymous ID: 876f4d Dec. 8, 2020, 5:27 a.m. No.11948068   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11948014

Q dropped re. Delegate Recount Scam, SC in a ruling mentioned it also

Q36

If Trump failed, if we failed, and HRC assumed control, we as Patriots were prepared to do the unthinkable (this was leaked internally and kept the delegate recount scam and BO from declaring fraud).

Dig deeper - missing critical points to paint the full picture.

There is simply no other way than to use the military. It’s that corrupt and dirty.

 

Delegate Recount Scam was reason they set up MF, they planned to tie DJT and MF in as cheating w/Russia to have BHO declare fraud and have electors become faithless.

  • Fake IC assessment

  • MF/DJT Russia set up/narrative

  • BHO announces fraud based on IC.

  • DJT denied 270moves to a comped House of Reps, under P Ryan.

  • House led by GOP elects HRC.

  • A bi-partisan scam for optics and plausible deniability of DNC/Dem conspiracy.

 

PLAN FAILED!

Before DJT had the keys to the Kingdom.

Which means we are looking good NOW!