>>11947581 (pb)
>should not be participating in discussions
Then Q should have realized that opening the discussion in the midst of people that frequent places like 4chan/pol/ in conjunction with POTUS tacitly endorsing it while openly denying any involvement with it whatsoever. All that's going to accomplish is getting people not only asking questions, but demanding results. "Autists", as Q likes to call some, call people out on their shit; it's how it works. Don't get me wrong, I'm very thankful for this entire medium, and the opportunity to interact directly with the Oval Office. This is something I look forward to sharing with my grandkids one day.
I think the plan has worked great from a multitude of angles. It's informative while placating, instructional while maintaining plausible deniability, kinetic while being actionless, and dismissive of decades of MK Ultra programming while giving folks a "last bastion" for answers; but only if you searched hard enough to seek them. Yeah, I'm a bit snarky; always have been. So is Q. "Ignorance is a choice" is about helpful of a statement as "It's not my fault nobody wanted to help you". Some of the nicest and most wonderful people I've ever known has been left in the dust, and it's actually a little painful to watch just how successful the programming has been on them.
I am forever grateful for being shown 40% of how bad it is, and see the results of what's being done to stop it (trafficking busts and the like). I don't like that "god" is invoked the way it is, but the reason for doing so should be obvious by now to most anons (read "bullshit stories"). I don't care for the head fakes, but it wouldn't work without them. I mean, if we could figure it out, then the DS could plan and set their own traps. You guys do realize the DS can do that, too, right? The decoding misspellings and date/time stamps are inconsistent at best, but pique curiosity when they can be made sense of (which is pretty rare, honestly). It's about 75% guess work, and 90% of all of it comes from shills looking to throw folks off the trail. No obvious repeatable patterns can be observed, and when the mountain of guesswork doesn't pan out, there's usually a very convenient excuse in conjunction with a plethora of shills to pounce on anons. But, it's the times it does work out that make it worth it.
The proofs are "ok", but are about as loosely put together as can be. Again, plausible deniability. Example: When someone makes a request for SOTU, and the response comes in an Easter address, that's not a proof. That's what people in the real world call a "coincidence". Especially since "tippy top" is something he's said many times in the years prior to becoming @POTUS. Why someone would even make "tippy top" a request item implies they are "on the team", or actually know him well already.
I think the biggest thing is anons don't seem to realize just how much of all this is, indeed, scripted (see previous paragraph). To me, that's the biggest proof of all and evidence of just how in control patriots really are. The kayfabe between POTUS and other actors should be very apparent by now. To add to the "scripted" argument, on the occasion the team has been called on some things that don't add up, the attacks labeling inquisitors as "shills" and subsequent (though far from frequent) Q response has a distinct pattern. Many are anons attacking other anons (read sycophant). If you've been around long enough, you see it. Let the "shills" and rabid anons go apeshit for a little while, then Q comes and plays mediator.
Let's be honest, folks. Many of the drops are so vague/obscure, there couldn't possibly be any way to determine what Q was getting at to begin with. "Baby on floor, hands in mouth" was out of context re: Syria. Then one day, some "genius" comes along and figures it meant was lysol and other floor cleaners cause cancer. Then Q comes back with "Finally! Someone that understands our comms!" Really, dude? Sorry, but first of all, you were talking about Syria chemical attacks. Secondly, why not just provide some links to real data for cancer-causing agents (in a separate drop, separate context), and their link to manufacturers of household products? How about "not all vaccines". Why does this have to be a club of super sekrit decoder folks that like to hoard the good stuff away from people trying and needing a little more help? Also, did POTUS end the experimental vaccines on our service people?