Anonymous ID: 2dd090 Dec. 8, 2020, 8:23 a.m. No.11949520   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9585

>>11949480

Incorrect.

The Judicial Branch was created to resolve disputes between the Legislative and Executive branches of government.

I wont disagree that that aspect has been horribly abused, but it's still one of their two purposes.

Anonymous ID: 2dd090 Dec. 8, 2020, 8:29 a.m. No.11949583   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9639 >>9725

>>11949535

Simple, anon.

As with any movie, as you get closer and closer to the climax, things you miss early in the movie become more obvious with hindsight.

Pompeo's warning to the Governors earlier this year was the clue.

As Q told us, this is bigger than we can imagine.

You think China is only targetting the USA?

Anonymous ID: 2dd090 Dec. 8, 2020, 8:36 a.m. No.11949688   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9742 >>0076

>>11949639

My take: Kemp may be a good guy; his SoS OTOH is not.

As with any good book or movie, moves and counter-moves.

Not everything is what it seems.

Think about it; in order for TX to file suit, the other States can't do anything to "fix" their own problems. If all the other states were taking action, TX would have no grounds to be in front of SCOTUS.

Anonymous ID: 2dd090 Dec. 8, 2020, 8:40 a.m. No.11949735   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9803

>>11949585

It's right there at the beginning: "hall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution…"

Disputes between the two branches are Consitutional matters – the EB feels the LB exceeded it's Constitutional authority by usurping an EB role; or the LB feels the EB is failing to perform its Consitutional duty, or is usurping a LB role.

Anonymous ID: 2dd090 Dec. 8, 2020, 8:44 a.m. No.11949774   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9818 >>9867 >>9880

>>11949725

Clue #2 - Trump saying he'll declas when it has the most impact…

I'll help you understand more: all this fixation on Obama… anons seriously think he was in charge of anything.

Same for the Clintons.

All roads point back to China, anon.

Anonymous ID: 2dd090 Dec. 8, 2020, 9:10 a.m. No.11950042   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11949803

You're misinterpreting what I said.

I said that clause is what gives SCOTUS power to rule on issues not related to State conflicts.

I even explicitly stated that SCOTUS has 2 roles.