NOW WITH AUDIO: Georgia Election Official Ralph Jones, Sr. Announced on Nov. 3rd Afternoon that Counting would Stop at 11 PM — Then Led Team to Count Stashed ‘Suitcase” Ballots

The Gateway Pundit identified Ralph Jones, Sr. as the third suspect in the Fulton County Georgia suitcase scandal. Ralph led a team of operatives in carrying out a massive voter fraud scandal on election night at the State Farm Center in Atlanta, Georgia. Ralph and his team plotted to remove ALL elections observers (Republicans) from the counting room so they could roll out their suitcases full of Joe Biden ballots and run them through the machine. Ralph Jones told local Atlanta news channel 11Alive that a water main broke at the State Farm Arena. Local WVLT8 reported: Nearly 40,000 absentee ballots will not be counted for the state of Georgia until at least Wednesday after a water main break, Fulton County officials said. The elections officials used the “water main break” to say there was a delay in counting and they used that to send people home — except for the suitcase gang.

Then Ralph Jones, Sr., Ruby Freeman and her daughter Shaye Ross went to work rolling out the hidden suitcases of ballots stashed under the table and hidden from view. It was their actions that gave Joe Biden the spike in unexplained votes in Georgia on Wednesday morning. It appears that this was a conspiracy to remove observers from the center and then to commit their hidden suitcase ballot fraud.

We now have actual audio of Ralph Jones — the elections official at the heart of the “suitcase scandal” telling government officials the State Farm Center will shut down at 10 or 11 PM on Election night! Georgia Secretary of State officials released an affidavit insisting there never was an intent to stop the count at 10:00 PM, but only the cutters were going to stop. But The Gateway Pundit was sent this link to the Zoom call from the evening of November 3rd and Ralph Jones, Sr. definitely told those listening that they are going to stop work at around 10 to 11 PM.

At the 28:00-28:23 minute mark. RALPH JONES: “I think we’ll still be scanning late today a little later on um we are scheduled to scan up to 10 and 11:00 o’clock today I should say tonight at the present time”

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/now-audio-georgia-election-official-ralph-jones-sr-announced-nov-3rd-afternoon-counting-stop-11-pm-led-team-count-stashed-suitcase-ballots/

>>11949477

Agree anon..also noticed that /qresearch/ does not appear on the home page..while others are still up.

Trump Operation Warp Speed officials will meet with Biden transition team

The chief scientific adviser to the Trump administration's Operation Warp Speed said the team planned to meet with members of President-elect Joe Biden's transition team this week. “We look forward to, you know, sharing all the information and working together," Operation Warp Speed's Moncef Slaoui said during an appearance on Good Morning America on Tuesday, hours before Operation Warp Speed's 3-hour summit is set to begin. The Washington Examiner learned on Monday that President-elect Joe Biden's team was not invited to participate in the event, which features healthcare and logistics experts involved in the vaccine distribution process. Asked to explain the reason for this, an official said, "This is not an exclusive event."

President Trump plans to sign an executive order on Tuesday privileging access for Americans over foreigners to COVID-19 vaccines. The order is intended to "reaffirm the position the president has held his entire administration, which is to prioritize America first," a senior administration official said. Asked about Trump's order, Slaoui, a former pharmaceutical executive, said that he was not involved and that he believes "we can deliver the vaccines as needed." "Frankly, I don't know. Frankly, I'm staying out of this. I can't comment. … We feel we can deliver the vaccines as needed," Slaoui said. "So, I don't know exactly what this order is about."

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/trump-operation-warp-speed-officials-will-meet-with-biden-transition-team

The Supreme Court is about to decide its most consequential case this term

This week, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in CIC Services, LLC v. Internal Revenue Service — a case that has largely flown under the radar but may be one of the most consequential cases of the term. In this case, the Supreme Court will decide whether an individual may be required to violate the law in order to challenge a regulatory requirement. The answer to that question should be obvious. Ordinarily, people are allowed to challenge a law before putting themselves in peril. And under the statute that governs review of administrative agency action, the Administrative Procedure Act, pre-enforcement review is the norm. Thus, the Supreme Court has long recognized that there is a presumption that a person is entitled to review before they are forced to violate the law. A 2004 law that requires taxpayers and their accountants to report certain transactions to the IRS is at the center of CIC Services. Accountants who fail to comply face stiff monetary penalties and possible prison time. The plaintiff in the case is a tax preparation firm that argues that the IRS failed to follow proper procedures in determining which transitions are reportable under the 2004 law. According to CIC Services, the IRS was required to seek input from the regulated community and undertake notice and comment rule-making rather than merely publishing a notice. The IRS, not surprisingly, disagrees and argues that CIC Services may not challenge those procedures unless it first violates the law and incurs a tax penalty. For such an absurd result, the IRS points to a Civil War-era statute known as the Anti-Injunction Act.

Until the 1850s, the government was financed by tariffs. Facing substantial debt due to the Civil War, Congress enacted its first income tax in 1861. When lawsuits threatened the government’s ability to collect taxes, Congress passed the Anti-Injunction Act. That 1867 statute prevents lawsuits from “restraining the assessment or collection of any tax.” The law thus generally requires a plaintiff first to pay a tax and then sue for a refund. While this statutory regime makes sense when the plaintiff is challenging a tax payment, it makes zero sense when the plaintiff is challenging a regulatory requirement like the one at issue in CIC Services. The IRS today regulates large portions of everyday life through regulation. As Justice Neil Gorsuch noted at oral argument, the IRS oversees enormous swaths of our economy, regulating everything from healthcare to child care to charity and the environment. The agency administers many of Congress’s most far-reaching laws, such as ERISA and the Affordable Care Act. Further, research has shown that the IRS “has a poor track record of complying with the basic rules of administrative law” — like the notice and comment procedures at issue in CIC Services.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/the-supreme-court-is-about-to-decide-its-most-consequential-case-this-term

https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/cic-services-llc-v-internal-revenue-service/

DIRECT MARKETING ASSOCIATION v. BROHL, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/13-1032_8759.pdf

Anons keep an eye on tranny porn fag.. just found child tranny porn pb..Eyes On

Current BO Activity..

>>11949983

Already in the bread anon.

>>11950086

Indeed.. announces exactly what he's up to..

>>11950132

Indeed..