>>11950076 lb
The substance of the TX complaint concerns unconstitutional changes to the conduct of election process by those states. The states cited are more obvious in having permitted constitutional violations, although NV can’t be far off, in terms of Sisolak’s edicts. AZ is more local than statewide, from what this anon has gleaned. Perhaps more significant was the intention to file before safe harbor date, regardless of whether that is determinative. The shorter the complaint, the quicker it may be filed. Pick your best arguments and facts and go for it. This might be the best explanation for leaving out additional states at this point. Note that this is a case over which SCOTUS has “original jurisdiction” under the Constitution.